Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-31-2006, 12:42 PM   #1
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default Officiall phots M3 E92?

From carmagazine







__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 12:44 PM   #2
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default

and some reliable info regarding this photos:

"It's not the real thing , look at the standard E92 mirror caps for evidence and besides we only start shooting the non-official production show vehicle this Thursday. Another element in these digital images is the pride of Germany we do not use other countries registration identities as seen here as UK to launch our cars we are very proud of having a car registered in Munich. Which is our homeland. whilst other countries utilize their own registration identity for their marketing purpose.

There is a reason to why the bootlid looks like that . And it's all to do with the core criteria of BMW M - in otherwords lightweight. This also helps the upcoming M3 Cabrio which will receive it's press launch in November 2007.

Although you are looking at allbeit digital enhanced pictures The rear end does look a lot better in real life in which BMW are moving to a more Kinetic approach to M-Division in design the kinetic approach therefore brings the M3 to it's M6 and Z4M Coupe brothers and it's upcoming baby brother M2 in 2009.
The positioning of the M3 now becomes much clearer that the M2 will become a reality because there is now an opening for a smaller model."
__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 12:58 PM   #3
ae86_16v
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
Default

^ Chrome window trim on a M car. . . I don't think so.

I do like the rear trunklid/bootlid. It doesn't seem to have the flares of the E46, more towards the looks of the E36 in that regard, similar to the standard models.

Thanks for putting the pics up. . .
ae86_16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 01:53 PM   #4
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

someone close this topic. This stuff is supposed to be going to BMW News in Car Chat.
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 02:23 PM   #5
TopGearNL
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Ewww...

I liked the E46 M3 a lot because it was different to the rest of E46 3-Series coupes... not like the E36, which was basically the same I hope they keep the differences between them, the M3 and the rest of E92 3-Series
Yep me too, some difference please :x
__________________
TopGearNL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 02:27 PM   #6
sameerrao
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 3,850
Default

Yuck! The E30 and E46 car had a lot of aggression built into the design. The E36 looked very sleek in coupe form. The E92 looks crap - the rear belongs on a Hyundai.

The 335i also looks shit!
__________________

"Tazio Nuvolari - The greatest driver of the past, the present and the future" - Ferdinand Porsche
sameerrao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 02:31 PM   #7
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
someone close this topic. This stuff is supposed to be going to BMW News in Car Chat.
Now now - don't try hide the "ugly" truth..
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 02:34 PM   #8
ae86_16v
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
Default

Originally Posted by sameerrao
Yuck! The E30 and E46 car had a lot of aggression built into the design. The E36 looked very sleek in coupe form. The E92 looks crap - the rear belongs on a Hyundai.

The 335i also looks shit!
Agreed. . . I guess they are paying more homage to the E36 in that regard. I think the E36 looks great especially for the time it was built.

Of course I am bias .
ae86_16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 03:04 PM   #9
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
someone close this topic. This stuff is supposed to be going to BMW News in Car Chat.
Now now - don't try hide the "ugly" truth..
who's hiding anything. i just want it put in the right place
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 03:42 PM   #10
Firdosh7747
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 226
Default

comon guys its not thaaaaaaaaat bad.. o wait nvrmnd yeh it is.... its disgusting
__________________

02 Honda CBR 954 RR
Firdosh7747 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 05:02 PM   #11
StanAE86
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,148
Default

Originally Posted by ae86_16v
^ Chrome window trim on a M car. . . I don't think so.
I think E28 M5 had chrome. So did my E34 M5. Not sure on the E39. Shadowline - blacking out the chrome, was an option.
__________________
-Stan
Still Reposting, Still Pimping
StanAE86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2006, 05:45 PM   #12
rave426
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 486
Default

I know my avatar is a "camo" M3, but I am kinda-fairly unbiased

I think an M3 like that would look amazing in real life. I have seen some 335's with the proper wheels and they look 2x better than pictures can portray.

I like it!!
__________________
Each car is special in its own way, Unless its a Hyundai Haha, Im just trippin
rave426 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 03:00 PM   #13
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default

The photos are fake!!


"Yesterday, we posted an article questioning the validity of the 2008 BMW M3 that’s featured on Car’s February 2007 issue. Today, we found scanned pictures of the specific article which, unfortunately, prove that the 2008 M3 we saw was photoshoped.

Even though the images are somewhat blurry and could easily be mistaken for being the “real thing”, the answer lays on the first page and specifically where it quotes: “Images Barry Hayden / Motor Forecast”. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the name, Motor Forecast is a company that specializes in “chops” – for example, they came up with the Chevrolet Camaro Convertible rendering that was shown on Autoweek.com."
__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 03:41 PM   #14
Stoopie
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United Provinces of the Kingdom of Great Netherlands
Posts: 2,119
Default

Lol Hoax!
Stoopie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2007, 08:41 PM   #15
EnzoLover
Regular User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portugal
Posts: 434
Default



__________________
EnzoLover is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump