Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-14-2003, 10:50 PM   #1
a007apl
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brasília-DF Brazil
Posts: 15,357
Default Check this

http://www.autofacts.ca/classics/fast.htm
a007apl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 11:21 PM   #2
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default

There is a few problems.. The list is missing several fast American production cars and several of the cars listed are borderline production cars. Still quite an impressive compilation.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 11:23 PM   #3
a007apl
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brasília-DF Brazil
Posts: 15,357
Default

I agree
a007apl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2003, 11:24 PM   #4
hemi_fan
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,670
Default

1963 Dodge Ramcharger is on there. Thats not a car, thats a pro-stock race team. lol. They really should have organized it better, its hard to tell which cars are factory or specialty.
__________________

1990 Ford Mustang GT
Factory Rated: 225hp, 300lbs tq
http://www.cardomain.com/profile/hemi_fan
hemi_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2003, 01:08 AM   #5
DeMoN
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
Default

damn that thing must have taken forever to list!
__________________
Guess who's Back!
DeMoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2003, 06:30 AM   #6
scubywrxr
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 644
Default

Nice list .. disorganised.. credit for the effort though...
scubywrxr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2003, 10:49 AM   #7
BADMIHAI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
Default

They sure left out alot of cars, but still a nice list.
BADMIHAI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2003, 12:29 PM   #8
twboy1999
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: toronto,
Posts: 2,393
Default

enzo owns f1
kekeke
__________________
ferrari freak
i am a porn addict
twboy1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2003, 11:54 PM   #9
BADMIHAI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
Default

Originally Posted by twboy1999
enzo owns f1
kekeke

It was about damn time some car did .... I'm just glad it's a Ferrari. Altough from 0 to 60, the F1 beats the Enzo. F1 has 3.2s. and Enzo has 3.7 s.
BADMIHAI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2003, 04:06 AM   #10
HoboPie
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Posts: 385
Default

nope, the best independant test of the Enzo was a 3.28 rounded to 3.3 by R&T, but several different testers got a 3.15 or below during the Ferrari event. It was admittedly downhill a little, but motortrend made some estimates based on their data and it is impressively still below 3.2, but I am unsure what exactly.

Also apparently during testing Ferrari was fairly confident it could break 3 seconds. I'm not sure if the production version can, but I'd say it is on par with the F1 in acceleration.

The F1 gets to 100mph a little quicker, but the Enzo beats it at everything until 150mph where the F1 again has the lead by .3 seconds, but that comes from the only test that went that high for the Enzo and also was one of the slowest for earlier acceleration figures. From there we really have no solid data for the Enzo as far as I know.
__________________
Formerly known as SG Blade.
HoboPie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2003, 05:42 AM   #11
scubywrxr
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 644
Default

Above 250kmh nothing can touch the Mclaren.... all the way to its top speed of 392kmh... cept maybe a callaway twin turbo special or a dauer porsche 962
scubywrxr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2003, 06:32 AM   #12
alondahan
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Israel
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by HoboPie
nope, the best independant test of the Enzo was a 3.28 rounded to 3.3 by R&T, but several different testers got a 3.15 or below during the Ferrari event. It was admittedly downhill a little, but motortrend made some estimates based on their data and it is impressively still below 3.2, but I am unsure what exactly.
true. motortrend says 0-60 in 3.14 sec. that's Mclaren beating record.
alondahan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2003, 04:44 AM   #13
tkach
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 98
Default

i still think the people from R&T are morons and i dont agree with them on very much cause they cant drive. the enzo is far better then the f1. more bang for the buck.f1 is more of a myth car for its price it should be faster too.
tkach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2003, 02:19 AM   #14
a007apl
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brasília-DF Brazil
Posts: 15,357
Default

http://www.syclone.freeserve.co.uk/rivals_cars.htm
a007apl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump