|
View Poll Results: What do you preffer?
|
|
A car with more torque
|
  
|
22 |
57.89% |
|
A car with more horsepower
|
  
|
16 |
42.11% |
03-30-2005, 05:20 AM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 1,407
|
Torque or Horsepower
If you had to choose between two cars (irregardless of brand or make) what would you get? One with more torque or horsepower? Why?
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 05:29 AM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Naples, FL
Posts: 1,407
|
As much as we want both... you have to pick only one.
__________________
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 06:43 AM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
Posts: 665
|
HP. If I would like torque, I'd buy a diesel.
__________________
L 555 BAT
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 06:53 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Tara Reid's bedroom
Posts: 2,048
|
|
Originally Posted by jakaracman
HP. If I would like torque, I'd buy a diesel.
|
same here.
Slovenians with 2 votes in the lead
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 07:34 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somerset/london
Posts: 1,636
|
This poll is silly :roll:
__________________
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 07:39 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
|
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Both... the Mercedes SL65 AMG... 8)
|
Totally agree with dani
Why choose, when you can have both in abundance.
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
|
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar 
|
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 08:13 AM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 100
|
i prefer torque....no point having such a high powered car but with no torque (like those rotaries)
__________________

The lancia Delta S4....Group B's finest....
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 08:39 AM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
|
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
|
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Both... the Mercedes SL65 AMG... 8)
|
Totally agree with dani
Why choose, when you can have both in abundance. 
|
Because if you go Merc, you're basically driving a vehicle akin to a high-powered speedboat on bicycle wheels.
Although I do agree with you. Have both. Buy BMW.
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 10:28 AM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
|
Both !! That's what engeneers are fighting for. But I voted for Torque.
Like dani_d_mas said, the perfect thing would be a nice Diesel ( like the 330cd for me  ) for the week and an M3 or even a M3 CSL for the track on the weekend. Someday I will have both
__________________
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 10:50 AM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 709
|
it would depend on the tradeoff. if i was choosing between a car that had 430whp and 350 wtq at higher rpm or a car with 390whp and 400wthq at lower rpm i would take the car with more torque. mainly because it would be more fun of a car to drive along the streets. i wouldnt plan on taking a car of mine to the track. for track use though higher hp will always have the advantage.
__________________
|
What good is Gas Mileage without Horsepower? That's why I bought a Saturn.
|
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 10:50 AM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
|
Originally Posted by Sir_GT
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
|
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Both... the Mercedes SL65 AMG... 8)
|
Totally agree with dani
Why choose, when you can have both in abundance. 
|
Because if you go Merc, you're basically driving a vehicle akin to a high-powered speedboat on bicycle wheels.
Although I do agree with you. Have both. Buy BMW. 
|
Well if you buy BMW, you'll buy hp, but little torque
As for the Merc, just put some spaceshutlle wheels and you're off.
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
|
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar 
|
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 12:12 PM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
|
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
|
Originally Posted by Sir_GT
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
|
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Both... the Mercedes SL65 AMG... 8)
|
Totally agree with dani
Why choose, when you can have both in abundance. 
|
Because if you go Merc, you're basically driving a vehicle akin to a high-powered speedboat on bicycle wheels.
Although I do agree with you. Have both. Buy BMW. 
|
Well if you buy BMW, you'll buy hp, but little torque
As for the Merc, just put some spaceshutlle wheels and you're off.
|
BMW has made it how ever so that their torque kicks in at low RPMs. Which is badass. You get a good sum of torque below 4500 rpms in most bimmers. I will agree that the merc does make a shit load more torque though.
__________________
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 12:23 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
|
Originally Posted by blah
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
|
Originally Posted by Sir_GT
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
|
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Both... the Mercedes SL65 AMG... 8)
|
Totally agree with dani
Why choose, when you can have both in abundance. 
|
Because if you go Merc, you're basically driving a vehicle akin to a high-powered speedboat on bicycle wheels.
Although I do agree with you. Have both. Buy BMW. 
|
Well if you buy BMW, you'll buy hp, but little torque
As for the Merc, just put some spaceshutlle wheels and you're off.
|
BMW has made it how ever so that their torque kicks in at low RPMs. Which is badass. You get a good sum of torque below 4500 rpms in most bimmers. I will agree that the merc does make a shit load more torque though.
|
Yeah, I agree with that, but I like the fact that in a Merc you get smacked when it suddenly kicks in, I just love it.
Mercedes= 60% comfort + 40% sport
BMW= 60% sport + 40% comfort
Well; that's the way I see it
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
|
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar 
|
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 01:14 PM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK, Slovenia, Poland
Posts: 1,124
|
|
Originally Posted by komotar
|
Originally Posted by jakaracman
HP. If I would like torque, I'd buy a diesel.
|
same here.
Slovenians with 2 votes in the lead 
|
Make that THREE Slovenians!!
I voted HP
__________________
Perfection comes in the form of any Ferrari
|
|
|
03-30-2005, 01:32 PM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
|
Well you cant have power without torque and you can't create torque without creating power.... so as coombsie says, a lil silly....
Having said that though, i prefer high revving, high power engines than low revving torquey engines
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|