01-21-2005, 02:40 AM
|
#16
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
|
It looks great from the side, but from the front, hmm it makes me wonder. It just doesnt do it for me. The headlights lines are not proportional to those of the car.
__________________
Guess who's Back!
|
|
|
01-21-2005, 03:22 AM
|
#17
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NoVA/Ohio, USA
Posts: 946
|
btw, look at the seats. pretty crazy... is that adjustable shoulder supports?
__________________

Xbox Live Gamertag: TheSlusbe
|
|
|
01-21-2005, 03:25 AM
|
#18
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 520
|
i can see this car appearing in Fast&Furious 10
__________________
lier, lier, pants on fire
|
|
|
01-21-2005, 04:43 AM
|
#19
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 416
|
|
Originally Posted by Sir_GT
£80k is more like $160k on the road. The E60 M5 is £65k, and the M6 is going to range from £68-75k. That's for "a bmw".
But £80k for a Lexus? No thanks.
|
Right on!
^^^ yeah it looks good, as FOXHOUND noted - a flagship model like a NSX-R rather than anything that'd sell. Supras were cool because they're were afforable twin turbo beasts.
|
|
|
01-21-2005, 06:52 AM
|
#20
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ljubljana, Slovenia
Posts: 665
|
Specs wont change much, shape will. And it's not sure to be a Lexus - they will make the car and then (or during that) decite if it's a Lexus or Toyota ...
__________________
L 555 BAT
|
|
|
01-21-2005, 02:01 PM
|
#21
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
^^^
specs will change depending on 'current' formula 1 rules... shape is about 90% complete
|
|
|
01-21-2005, 09:36 PM
|
#22
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,062
|
I don't see why they would bring it to market if they know they'd lose a bunch of money - there has to be an economic reason they're doing this. so what i think is that either this will not go through as a project, or it will go through and be serious competition in its class offering a better "bang for buck" or some other performance-for-cost advantage to make up for its lack of a reputation as a serious performance-car-manufacturer.
|
|
|
01-21-2005, 09:41 PM
|
#23
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
|
specs will change depending on 'current' formula 1 rules... shape is about 90% complete
|
i hope they change the exhaust ports. they look a little out of place IMO
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
01-22-2005, 09:03 AM
|
#24
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Liverpool or Suffolk, England
Posts: 161
|
Needs a more aggressive nose IMO. I think there are some serious hints of Celica in the shape which I think Lexus needs to move away from.
__________________
If at first you don't succeed, sod it.
|
|
|
01-23-2005, 10:06 PM
|
#25
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,420
|
god, that car looks great, but is this a repost?
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|