Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > What Do You Drive Or Ride ?

What Do You Drive Or Ride ? No bullshit inside here please



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-20-2004, 07:12 PM   #1
mit5005
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida,USA
Posts: 594
Default Nice Jaguar

Jaguar S-Type R

I know it is not mine, but it belongs to my parents (I guess that counts too). I have driven it a few times and it is very nice. It has very good pick-up. It is also very quiet too, all you can really hear is the hum of the supercharger.

Here are some specs.

ENGINE/DRIVETRAIN
Engine Type 90° V8, aluminum alloy cylinder head/block, DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder, intercooled supercharger.

Displacement—liters 4.2 liter
Bore x stroke—in. 3.39 in. x 3.56 in.
Compression ratio 9.1 : 1
Horsepower - (SAE) 390 bhp @ 6100 rpm
Maximum Torque 399 lb.-ft @ 3500 rpm
Ignition system Electronic
Engine control Electronic throttle
Fuel injection Electronic fuel injection
Transmission type 6-speed automatic
Final drive ratio 2.87:1
Drivetrain Front engine, rear-wheel drive




PERFORMANCE

0-60 mph 5.3 sec.
Maximum speed 155 mph, electronically limited



TIRES/BRAKING/SUSPENSION

Wheel type and size 18 x 8-inch/18 x 9.5-inch alloy, Zeus
Tire size Front: 245/40 ZR 18
Rear: 275/35 ZR 18
Braking system Electronically controlled 4-channel anti-lock brake system with Electronic Stability Braking System (ESBS) and Electronic Parking Brake (EPB).
Steering Power-assisted, speed-sensitive, variable-ratio rack-and-pinion.
Turning circle 37 ft. 8 inches
Front suspension Independent forged aluminum double wishbone design with unequal length, upper and lower wishbone. R-Performance tuned computer active technology suspension with two - stage damping, 32mm anti-roll bar (CATS).
Rear suspension Independent double wishbone design. R - Performance tuned computer active technology suspension with two stage damping, 18mm anti-roll bar (CATS).



DIMENSIONS

Length 192.0 in.
Height 56.0 in.
Width 81.1 in. (with mirrors)
71.6 in. (without mirrors)

Track Front: 60.4 in. /
Rear: 60.7 in.
Wheelbase 114.5 in.

Coefficient of drag (Cd) 0.32
Vehicle weight 4046 lb.


Permitted roof load 220 lb.
Permitted trailer load 1654 lb. (unbraked)* 4079 lb. (braked)*
Headroom Front: 38.6 in. /
Rear: 36.4 in. (with moonroof)



Shoulder room Front: 56.4 in. /
Rear: 56.7 in.
Trunk (MVMA) 14.1 cu.ft.

Fuel 18.4 gal.





mit5005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 07:14 PM   #2
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

It's a very fine ride and thanks for telling us the car is your parent's

But the quality of the pics is very bad, why? Is there some sort of auto resize on that host?
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 07:31 PM   #3
mit5005
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida,USA
Posts: 594
Default

Well the lighting really sux and the host does resize automatically when it is over 250k. I don't know maybe it is my camera. I have a Kodak Easyshare DX6490, 4 megapixel and 10x optical zoom. Are all my pics this bad?
mit5005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 07:37 PM   #4
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

It's not the camera for sure, but you can see on the picture that every line is not a line but like broken.. like aliasing in videogames... this happens with autoresize usually.. You should resize your pics yourself with Photoshop or similar before posting them, because I'm sure it's not the camera
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 07:43 PM   #5
Erez
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
Default

or.. upload the pics here:
http://planetsideimages.com/index.php
__________________

Things worth having don't come easy..
Erez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 07:48 PM   #6
mit5005
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida,USA
Posts: 594
Default

Well I resized them and re-uploaded them, are they better now?
mit5005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 07:49 PM   #7
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

You bet, way better now
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2004, 07:51 PM   #8
mit5005
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Florida,USA
Posts: 594
Default

Wow, and they are even bigger now. I got to remember to do that next time. Thx for the heads up.
mit5005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 01:25 AM   #9
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by mit5005
Well the lighting really sux and the host does resize automatically when it is over 250k. I don't know maybe it is my camera. I have a Kodak Easyshare DX6490, 4 megapixel and 10x optical zoom. Are all my pics this bad?
Nothing wrong with your camera - don't listen to these "Digital Camera snobs"... - DX6490 is what I use...
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 01:26 AM   #10
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Oh yeah - nice ride there... I just notice all the S-Type R's I come across want to "have a go"... not unlike M5 drivers..
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 03:44 AM   #11
novass
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,660
Default

Nice Jag! In black that thing looks wicked. I drove an S-Type with the 4.0 and it was a pretty nice car. Id love to give the extra hp version R a go.
__________________
2001 Audi A4 1.8T Quattro 5spd
1963 Chevy NovaSS 415hp 355ci V8

"Live as if your were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever."
-Mahatma Gandhi
novass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 05:44 AM   #12
coombsie66
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: somerset/london
Posts: 1,636
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Oh yeah - nice ride there... I just notice all the S-Type R's I come across want to "have a go"... not unlike M5 drivers..
How do the S-Type R and M5 drivers fair?! (arnt the american versions slower due to stricter emmisions regs?)
__________________
coombsie66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 05:47 AM   #13
AlienDB7
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,914
Default

A very nice jag indeed! Yes, I have to admit, I love the jag s-type (second to the XK's)

Have to test drive one someday.
AlienDB7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 07:31 AM   #14
gis
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lancashire,United Kingdom
Posts: 3,846
Default

the jag s type R is indeed a fast car,i have had the pleasure of sitting in the passenger seat when this car was taken to its 155mph limiter.i was surprised how quick it got there for such a big car.im not a fan of the looks but still,its VERY fast car.

congrats to you and your parents
__________________

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/5803/dansigsp7.jpg
gis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2004, 07:41 AM   #15
tanelvali
Regular User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 576
Default

whats the price of this car?
tanelvali is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump