03-13-2004, 02:53 AM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Ford GT - 565rwhp....
Has this been posted on JW yet?
http://www.mustangweekly.com/2004/ma.../n03-6-3rd.asp
Seems a lot more than Ferrari 360's better be getting nrevous about this time...
565rwhp is about 660hp at the crank....
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 03:00 AM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: T-dot
Posts: 231
|
__________________
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 03:13 AM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Thanks - but then where are the mods to move 666's topic...
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 03:23 AM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Minnesota, United States
Posts: 3,120
|
Originally Posted by RC45
Thanks - but then where are the mods to move 666's topic... 
|
I wondered the same thing, but oh well. TT has to slip up sometime right? LOL
I'd move it myself, but it would delete other peoples posts, and people sometimes get upset by that.
Anyway, might as well just lock mine since this one is in the right section.
I've seen a comparison of the Ford GT with a 360 Stradale and a Porka GT3. It was a bit quicker, but not by much. I wonder what the mileage was on the GT they used? If it really does have that much power, it should have killed them!
__________________
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 06:28 AM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
|
It is a lot faster.
I doubt both Ferrari or Porsche will be nervous. First of all the GT is a limited run and will sell way north over the MSRP of $140k, secondly their image is too strong, and their clientele in general choose for Ferrari/Porsche for the whole package their line-up brings. Porsche owners in general don't consider Fords, as bad ass as this GT might be.
__________________
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 07:18 AM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
0-60mhp in 3 seconds :shock: :shock: , is that correct
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar 
|
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 11:33 AM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,247
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
0-60mhp in 3 seconds :shock: :shock: , is that correct 
|
nonononono no way speedkillar i am thinking the very best run even when the engine is broken in with more hp will only be 3.6 MAYBE 3.5 i cant see it nearly breaking the 3 second barrier!
__________________
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 12:43 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA/ Bloomington, IN, USA
Posts: 2,624
|
I think Road and Track already tested it and got a 3.3 second 0-60 time out of it...but that's really very dependent on the atmosphere, the road surface, the temperature...etc...etc...etc...however, 3 seconds sounds a little bit optimistic.
__________________
me-- "Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't. Sometimes I feel like the moon is made of cheese"
my Hindibonics-speaking Indian roommate--"Dawgs, do you have any idea how much bacteria that would take?"
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 02:59 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 2,558
|
Originally Posted by Vansquish
I think Road and Track already tested it and got a 3.3 second 0-60 time out of it...but that's really very dependent on the atmosphere, the road surface, the temperature...etc...etc...etc...however, 3 seconds sounds a little bit optimistic.
|
Are you sure ? i am sure it was more like 4.2 seconds ....... read again
__________________
"It changes direction like a fly, grips like a barnacle and goes like a jet fighter on combat power" ( Lambo Gallardo ) .JC.
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 03:31 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: T-dot
Posts: 231
|
I have the R&T issue in front of me. I am sure the result was 3.8s
__________________
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 06:53 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Ok, 666's topic was moved and I hope you won't mind RC if I'm closing yours
Sorry guys.. yesterday and today were pretty busy and offline days
The discussion can go on here: http://www.motorworld.net/forum/showthread.php?t=7888
__________________
|
|
|
03-13-2004, 07:40 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
OK - just get 666 to edit his title to reflect all 565rwhp...
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|