General Chat General chat about anything that doesn't fit in another section here |
01-29-2007, 05:53 AM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Near London, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,815
|
WTF : Car owner blames Hammond for crash
"Jet car owner blames Richard Hammond for the high-speed crash
The owner of the jet car involved in a high-speed crash which nearly claimed the life of Richard Hammond appears on Monday to lay the blame for the accident on the Top Gear presenter.
Dramatic footage of the crash clearly showed the car's right front tyre shredded following a blowout as Hammond tore down an airfield runway at speeds approaching 300mph.
He appeared to lose control of the dragster, which veered off the runway on to the grass before overturning.
But on Sunday's Sun newspaper, Colin Fallows suggested Hammond was to some extent to blame for the crash by "failing to adhere to the briefing".
He said: "Mr Hammond had a puncture and carried on with the tyre deflated", adding that Hammond "stood on the brakes" after the blowout.
He said: "Once these cars are in motion you don't touch the brakes. You stay on the prescribed line and should always be aware of the unexpected.
"By failing to adhere to the briefing, what would have been a controllable incident ended in a major accident."
The BBC and Mr Fallows' firm, Primetime Landspeed Engineering, may be prosecuted for failing to take due care, the paper said.
On Sunday night dramatic footage of the 288mph crash was shown for the first time.
Aired on Top Gear's first show of the new series, it revealed the 36-year-old's miraculous escape when he crashed while filming a stunt for the programme in September."
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 05:57 AM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,085
|
Well this should be interesting
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 06:04 AM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leiria, Portugal
Posts: 1,443
|
Hum.. strange... why only now the guy says this???
__________________
CB
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 06:09 AM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
|
^Obvious. He may be prosecuted and needs to shift blame. Furthermore, the BBC might sue him. He's also probably going to sue the BBC.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 06:19 AM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Near London, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,815
|
Yep exactly, trying to "pass the buck" sadly for him though, the video footage proves otherwise IMO.
OK so maybe he should have opened the chutes instead of hitting the brakes, but in the split second it all happened that would have been everyones natural reaction.
In anycase I cant see what could have been done to make it anything other than a very serious accident, the fact he is still alive and in good health would surely mean it was a good outcome for such an horrific "accident" and in that case perhaps he did do the right thing after all.
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 06:24 AM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: north-south of nowhere
Posts: 6,869
|
i cant believe this
__________________
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 06:33 AM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
|
In anycase I cant see what could have been done to make it anything other than a very serious accident, the fact he is still alive and in good health would surely mean it was a good outcome for such an horrific "accident" and in that case perhaps he did do the right thing after all.
|
Indeed. Hammond has recovered. In any case, there was no reason for him to say this in public. If there is to be investigation into the possibility of prosecution, the facts would come out. If it was Hammond's fault, well, so be it. No need to try and tarnish people unnecessarily.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 07:34 AM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 510
|
Originally Posted by Jabba
Yep exactly, trying to "pass the buck" sadly for him though, the video footage proves otherwise IMO.
OK so maybe he should have opened the chutes instead of hitting the brakes, but in the split second it all happened that would have been everyones natural reaction.
In any case I cant see what could have been done to make it anything other than a very serious accident, the fact he is still alive and in good health would surely mean it was a good outcome for such an horrific "accident" and in that case perhaps he did do the right thing after all.
|
Yup, like Hammond said it was 0.4 seconds between the tyre shredding and the accident.
__________________
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 07:38 AM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United Provinces of the Kingdom of Great Netherlands
Posts: 2,119
|
LOL Jeremy already said this at the end of the show, why didn't you notice the tire being ruptured while driving  Anyway, let's just wait and see what happens next!
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 12:07 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,027
|
If setting a landspeed record is 99.99% safe anyone would have a go. Unfortunately chances that it goes wrong are big. I'm sure everybody tried their best it making this succeed, but unfortunately the project failed. Agreements for this case should have been madeon beforehand.
If one party needs to be blamed, I'd say it's the tyre company, but I doubt they guaranteed that the tyre would last at that speed. So IMO, no need to blame anyone.
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 12:13 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,566
|
Sucks how legal issues always have to come into play... I hope everything works out so no legal action is necessary.. Everyone should just be glad he's still alive.
__________________
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 12:28 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 2,670
|
what a fucking sue happy idiot. i am not totally sure on how the legal system works in England, but i really don't think that will even get off the ground in the court room.
__________________
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 12:41 PM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
|
Yeah sure, what a moron. Everybody can clearly see it wasn't his fault. And if it was Hammonds fault then he wasn't instructed well and that comes down to the owner... :roll:
__________________
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 01:14 PM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
I'll be the odd one out here - in a way, Hamster was driving, and as the driver it kinda is always your fault.
Then again I am one of the folks who thinks he shouldn't have done the run to begin with - it was a huge risk to take.
|
|
|
01-29-2007, 01:34 PM
|
#15
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: north-south of nowhere
Posts: 6,869
|
^ true
just like putting him in the car with all that electricity running through it, seeing if the car dose better in below freezing conidiotns or humans ... :roll:
this one is the worst imo .... what kind of record were they gonna make anyway ... they wanted to beat the thrust ssc or what ? .. :roll:
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|