| Video and Picture Links WORKING HTTP or FTP links only, no torrents or other P2P links. |
12-14-2003, 09:39 AM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK, Slovenia, Poland
Posts: 1,124
|
Ferrari F2003-GA vs. Eurofighter
|
|
|
|
12-14-2003, 09:47 AM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Nice, I hope they will be better than the TV coverage I saw  thanks!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2003, 09:53 AM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,901
|
without TC wonder if schuey would lose out on the shortest run
__________________
Two rules for life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2003, 10:26 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK, Slovenia, Poland
Posts: 1,124
|
Sorry, the acceleration runs were 600 m, 900 m and 1200 m
Now look at these numbers:
It took 9.4 s @ 294 km/h for the F2003-GA to go 600 m (1970 ft.)... that means that the F2003 will do the 1/4 mile in about 5.x sec.... ON A WET TRACK!!!! It beat the jet by 0.2 s.
On the 900 m, the Ferrari made it in 13.2 s @ 305 km/h (it lost to the eurofighter by 0.2 s... but remember, it was WET!)
On the 1200 m, it came in 16.7 s @ 308 km/h, but on the other hand, the jet made it in 14.2 s (!!!).
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2003, 11:33 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,901
|
it only gained 3km/h in a space of 300m? they must be running high downforce config.
__________________
Two rules for life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2003, 11:42 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
But we also have to consider that 300 meters at 300 km/h go by in just 3 or 4 seconds  or something like that
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-14-2003, 12:16 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 29
|
Pretty impressive video to watch anyway. They put an olympic 100-meter sprinter against a CART racecar in my city 2-3 years ago. The car won hands down and the race team knew it before the car because their car was already faster on 100 meters than the 100m world record... but it was still fun to watch.... too bad I did not shoot (camera) it.
|
|
|
|
|
12-15-2003, 03:37 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: HELL!
Posts: 890
|
Cool, Thanks for the links.
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2003, 02:46 AM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Thailand
Posts: 269
|
oi...that vid is more impressive than the one by indy cars
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2003, 02:55 AM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 32
|
Why this race? I want to see a IRL vs Cart vs Formula 1
|
|
|
|
|
12-16-2003, 02:56 AM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 258
|
That was totaly kick ASS!
__________________
Porsche:
Spiritually,we never stray too far from the racetrack!
|
|
|
|
|
12-17-2003, 01:56 PM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Israel
Posts: 299
|
too bad it was wet. otherwise it would have been 2-1 for the Ferrari
|
|
|
|
|
12-17-2003, 05:39 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,252
|
|
Originally Posted by Fishey
Why this race? I want to see a IRL vs Cart vs Formula 1
|
F1 doesn't run on slicks like IRL but the f1 would win in a staight line and on a track, IRL-700hp CART-676 F1-900+ and F1 is lighter then all of then, the only thing holding them back is the tires,
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-17-2003, 10:30 PM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 317
|
awesome, thanks 
|
|
|
|
|
12-17-2003, 11:28 PM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Waterloo Engineering / Oshawa / Toronto
Posts: 1,120
|
Thanks a lot - Nice Vid 
__________________
***THANK YOU JABBA***
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
