RUF 911 turbo vs CL65 Kleeman

[Just_me]

550hp vs 739hp and 1300 nm

http://www.maffs.org/2005CL65/RturbovCL65.mpg

http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/s...threadid=37449

[Ghostbat]

Amazingly fast cars. Thanks for the video Just_me.

[franck bullitt]

Thx for sharing these videos

[MartijnGizmo]

Wow, that's some heavy metal!

[martin100]

Sounds great! Thanks for the link mate! Didn´t know that Kleemann has already released a stronger 65 engine.

[mindgam3]

How much torque has the RUF got? Just shows how much better engineered the porker is - considering how much faster it is with less grunt.

Thats at Bruntingthorpe UK btw

[Stikz]

sweet vid man, thanks.

[JoeHahn]

Look at that baby pull!

The guy who owns the RUF also owns an original 'Yellowbird' which is even faster.

[coombsie66]

I dont know about a 'well balanced' car being faster in a straight line, certainly a car with closer ratios that weighs less is just as fast as a big lazy heavy hugely powered barge.

[AE86Baz]

Closer ratios = less top speed?

Depends if it revs higher....

Those cars were taking part in the Pistonheads VMax event I think...

http://www.pistonheads.com

[Just_me]

Originally Posted by JoeHahn Look at that baby pull! The guy who owns the RUF also owns an original 'Yellowbird' which is even faster.

he also own the new M5

[JoeHahn]

but thats not as fast and doesnt compare to these monsters

[mindgam3]

He reached 202mph at the end of the straight on a different run (verified)..... the macca F1 has only been faster through the trap at bruntingthorpe.

From his data logger:




Notice hes still gaining 1.4mph per second at 200mph!

www.krakar.co.uk/pix/vmax/ferrari_waving.mov

http://www.krakar.co.uk/pix/vmax/por...g_up_a_bmw.mov

355 and another of the RUF at bruntingthorpe

Pics:

Audi->Ferrari
Ferrari->Lotus
Lotus->Porsche
Porsche->Vmax


Here's the speeds from the rest of the cars there on the day:

202 GuyR - Ruf GT2 (Rear wing taken off)
192 Maff - CL65 AMG (derestricted etc....)
190 Derestrictor - 993TT (timetravelspec)
188 Rods - 996TT DMS modified
187 AdamT - Ruf RTurbo (550)
183 Dazren - 996TT X50
183 911 Habit - 996TT modified
182 Nastywej - Lambo Gallardo
181 W8 PMC - Audi RS6 modified
181 Rob DMS - BMW E60 M5 (derestricted etc....)
181 Bluesatin - 996TT X50 (Factory Spoiler kit)
179 Neal McDonnell - Lotus Esprit V8GT
178 Toppers - TVR Tuscan S
176 S3am - 996 GT3 mk 2
175 IanHep - Ferrari 550M
174 Snuffy - Esprit Sport 350
174 F355 spider - Ferrari 360
172 Rob.E - Lotus Esprit V8GT
168 Flying Trotter - 997 C2S
168 Luca Brazzi - TVR Tuscan
166 "alex" - 997 C4S
165 Jeremyc - AM DB7 Vantage
164 Scotty - Audi S4 modified
164 Mancunian - Lotus Esprit V8GT
163 Markxw - 996 C4
162 Outnumbered - BMW M3
162 Guymarks - TVR T350C
162 Madmile - Seat Ibiza modified
160 Trackdemon - Honda NSX 3.0
160 Gyrock - M3 CSL (limiter)
158 Ibroker - M3 CSL (limiter)
157 GregE240 - 500SL (R129 1990 vintage, pesky limiters!)
155 Spdw - Subaru WRI STI
150 Andy M - VX220 Turbo
150 Charlieboy - S4 Avant bi-turbo (my mate driving tut)
145 StuB - BMW Z3 supercharged
144 Dunc - AM V8 (mid 1990s variety)
142 Leean - Audi S3
141 Davey S1 - Lotus Exige
138 Muncher - VX220

[coombsie66]

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas Originally Posted by coombsie66 I dont know about a 'well balanced' car being faster in a straight line, certainly a car with closer ratios that weighs less is just as fast as a big lazy heavy hugely powered barge. Closer ratios = less top speed ... and that RUF was damn fast!!

Closer ratio's means better acceleration, as long as it doesnt run out of revs then doesnt have a detrimental effect on top speed, which the RUF didnt appear to do.
That merc had very tall gears to im guessing that on the rev limiter in top gear (does it have 6 speed? maybee even 5!) it would be doing a fair bit more than 200 mph.

[Banchi105]

I love dirty supercars!