07-07-2005, 11:02 AM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
Very impressive figures. Nice to see a Merc engine that revs a little higher. Too bad it's lost some torque but as we se with the E60 M5 a car can be pretty fast without being a torqumonster.. 7G-Tronic?
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 11:08 AM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
It's about 20% more powerfull in its segment than its rivals, quite impressive indeed, but I will miss the rumble the SC engine make, but this should sound quite nice too.
It's also funny, that just as MB is starting with NA that BMW is turboiing
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
|
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar 
|
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 11:10 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 709
|
cool, thanks for the news, i have been waiting to see what the 63 power output would be. i am kinda confused with this engine. what was it developed for? is it replacing the supercharged 55, or maybe its just replacing the N/A 55? i dunno, i dont really see the point of this new engine. the supercharged 55 is a great powerplant and suits the heavy mercs well with all the torque it has. this engine seems peaky comparitively. maybe someone can explain.
__________________
|
What good is Gas Mileage without Horsepower? That's why I bought a Saturn.
|
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 11:12 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
It's about 20% more powerfull in its segment than its rivals, quite impressive indeed, but I will miss the rumble the SC engine make, but this should sound quite nice too.
|
Then feel free to bolt on a SC
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 11:16 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
|
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
It's about 20% more powerfull in its segment than its rivals, quite impressive indeed, but I will miss the rumble the SC engine make, but this should sound quite nice too.
|
Then feel free to bolt on a SC 
|
Can't think what the power output will be....monstrous :shock:
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
|
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar 
|
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 11:27 AM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
All three germans (audi,bmw,mb) going NA . Lovely
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 12:12 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
|
Originally Posted by Just_me
All three germans (audi,bmw,mb) going NA . Lovely 
|
Yeah lovely it is, but isn't BMW planning on turboiing the 335ti
But I guess they will no matter what keep their forced induction programs, at least a couple of engines.
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
|
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar 
|
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 12:49 PM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
|
Originally Posted by Just_me
All three germans (audi,bmw,mb) going NA . Lovely 
|
Yeah lovely it is, but isn't BMW planning on turboiing the 335ti
But I guess they will no matter what keep their forced induction programs, at least a couple of engines.
|
As long as they dont use turbo in M cars, I'm happy
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 12:59 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
|
Originally Posted by Just_me
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
|
Originally Posted by Just_me
All three germans (audi,bmw,mb) going NA . Lovely 
|
Yeah lovely it is, but isn't BMW planning on turboiing the 335ti
But I guess they will no matter what keep their forced induction programs, at least a couple of engines.
|
As long as they dont use turbo in M cars, I'm happy 
|
I don't think BMW will do that to its M models, the moment they reached the peak in the V10, they'll just make a V12
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
|
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar 
|
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 01:05 PM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The oldest continent
Posts: 751
|
|
Originally Posted by Just_me
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
|
Originally Posted by Just_me
All three germans (audi,bmw,mb) going NA . Lovely 
|
Yeah lovely it is, but isn't BMW planning on turboiing the 335ti
But I guess they will no matter what keep their forced induction programs, at least a couple of engines.
|
As long as they dont use turbo in M cars, I'm happy 
|
Since when does BMW need a turbo for the M cars. I'm not saying that you said so, but hey there are the best without turbo always with naturally inspired power... M Power
Furthermore, if they use a turbo on a production M car........ well I bet you've seen footage with a turbocharged BMW!!!
__________________

Always outnumbered, never outguned!!!
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 01:08 PM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
Naturally-Aspirated V-8 (90-degrees)
4-valves per cylinder
6208 ccm displacement
Max power: 510 hp (380kW)@ 6800 rpm
Max torque: 464lb-ft (630Nm) @ 5200 rpm
Redline: 7200 rpm
|
sounds like a modifed 4 valve variant of the 6.2 l SRT8 engine... with only 85 more ponies then the 2 valve version here...
|
|
|
07-07-2005, 02:28 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Rather a weak engine all things considered
|
|
|
07-08-2005, 05:55 AM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Trondheim, Norway
Posts: 220
|
The torque is disapointing, but that's what you get when you go NA. Both the fact that you have to rev up to 5200 rpm before you get max torque, and that it is "only" 630 Nm. They are good numbers, but nowhere near the performance they have had with superchargers.
I gues this is more suited for driving hard on a track than cruising. Is MB trying to change their image?
__________________
|
|
|
07-08-2005, 06:00 AM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
LOL I really doubt that "only" 630 Nm are not suited for relaxed highway cruising dude! I fear we are too used to silly cars with 1000+ Nm these days :bah:
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|