Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-13-2005, 08:06 AM   #1
inso
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
Default M6 in detail germancarfan and AMS tested performance figures

http://www.germancarfans.com/news.cf...id/2050413.003


Update:
Some real test reports, with complete performance figures:
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=54612

Just Check those performance figures. 12.2 for the quarter mile, 13.0s 0-200km/h, 8.7s 0-100mph. M6 is hauling some serious ass.
http://www.m5board.com/vbulletin/att...achmentid=6175
inso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2005, 08:40 AM   #2
inso
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
Default

My mate is also waiting for delivery in about a month, that´ll be the only one to come in finland this year. Janne Ahonen finnish skijumper is going to get one, but has to settle for new M5 until the second one gets in Finland.
inso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2005, 08:22 PM   #3
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

yes ronin, you will be able to order the car with out the PDC sensors.

I've got mixed feelings about the 6. The coupe is definetly a better looking car than the cabrio. it looks a little like the Toyota Solara in the rear and that's what i don't like about it. But it has the power to make up for it, plain and simple. the M6 is going to be a friggin huge kick in the ass
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 03:45 AM   #4
TT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
Default

Ronin, have you ever seen one in the metal? I mean, a "regular" E63 wich has the same shape of the M obviously.
Because it is much better that what pictures can show you!
__________________
TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 07:15 AM   #5
inso
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
Default

http://www.e39m5.se/diverse_bilder/M6_01.jpg
http://www.e39m5.se/diverse_bilder/M6_02.jpg
http://www.e39m5.se/diverse_bilder/M6_03.jpg

some pictures of a black M6 in a showroom.
inso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 08:07 AM   #6
mindgam3
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
Default

Originally Posted by TT
Ronin, have you ever seen one in the metal? I mean, a "regular" E63 wich has the same shape of the M obviously.
Because it is much better that what pictures can show you!
I agree, they don't look that special in the mags and online but in the metal I was suprised at how curvy and good looking they are
mindgam3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 08:31 AM   #7
inso
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
Default

http://broadcaster.freespeed.de/broa...5&t=67&r=1&f=1

Short video of M6 also. from auto und motorsport. When i drove 645, it impressed me, driving was easy and there was still nice grunt, even thou no M-motor. And if there is some details that people dont like, it has grown on me, like the E60 5-series did. Car won´t look dated soon. And if there still was something to dislike, i bet i would forget it, when the v10 talks it´s talk
inso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 09:16 AM   #8
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

Originally Posted by Ronin005
ive said it before and ill say it again, this car is crap. the whole rear end of the car si pure crap, the trunk lid looks so out of place its sad, looks like someone just took a piece of plastic and glued it to the rear in a hurry.
then its the bottom portion of the bumper, around the exhaust tips it looks unfinished.
then you move up and you have the backing up sensors, thats just damn ugly. is there anyway of ordering the car without those??
then take go up another level and you get to the brake light and reverse light section and again that looks like it was glued into place at the last min.

the front of the car looks slightly better, and i also dont like that line going down the side of the car past the midway point on the door.


i really dont see what people see in this car at all.
Well, that's how it is with beemers now. It's either you like the design or you don't. I like it. Clarkson likes it. I know quite a few other successful people who like it as well. But I'll be the first one to say that not everybody I met has liked it.

Besides, it's quite a bit of car to get for £68k anyway. CF roof (and bumpers according to that article), V10 engine, good seating, good handling, exclusivity, good dealership service, and it can seat 2 adults and 2 kids.
__________________
Studio Gecko
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 10:55 AM   #9
inso
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
Default

http://cars.msn.co.uk/CarReviewshome...05/Default.asp

one more review of the car, even thou it is msn, there is talk about the manual transmission and stuff. The article says that UK will get cars in the 4th quarter of ´05 and price will be 80k£.

And about the room, there is room for 4adults, just not too long at the back, because of the roofline.
inso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 11:01 AM   #10
dingo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
Default

Originally Posted by mindgam3
Originally Posted by TT
Ronin, have you ever seen one in the metal? I mean, a "regular" E63 wich has the same shape of the M obviously.
Because it is much better that what pictures can show you!
I agree, they don't look that special in the mags and online but in the metal I was suprised at how curvy and good looking they are
I also agree, after seeing a few on the road they have become my favourite of the current BMW's and even out of all cars. They really have a good presence on the road and the lines/curves aren't nearly as bad as they look in the pic If I think that about the regular E63 then this M6 should be even better
__________________
dingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 10:04 PM   #11
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

Originally Posted by inso
http://cars.msn.co.uk/CarReviewshome/FDBMWM6Apr05/Default.asp

one more review of the car, even thou it is msn, there is talk about the manual transmission and stuff. The article says that UK will get cars in the 4th quarter of ´05 and price will be 80k£.

And about the room, there is room for 4adults, just not too long at the back, because of the roofline.
£80k??? :shock:

The performance better justify the premium over the M5, that's for sure.
__________________
Studio Gecko
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 10:13 PM   #12
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

Originally Posted by Sir_GT
Originally Posted by inso
http://cars.msn.co.uk/CarReviewshome/FDBMWM6Apr05/Default.asp

one more review of the car, even thou it is msn, there is talk about the manual transmission and stuff. The article says that UK will get cars in the 4th quarter of ´05 and price will be 80k£.

And about the room, there is room for 4adults, just not too long at the back, because of the roofline.
£80k??? :shock:

The performance better justify the premium over the M5, that's for sure.
Considering the 645 is already more than the 545 i'm not at all surprised. i'm thinking that the acceleration on the M6 will be slightly faster than the M5 due to the aerodynamics of the car alone. I belive the 6 is also lighter than the 5 but i can't be sure because i don't have the 645 training manual.
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 10:28 PM   #13
Johns
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: USA, worldwide Pimp
Posts: 854
Default

that shit is not worth the price 0X
Johns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2005, 11:30 PM   #14
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

Originally Posted by Johns
that shit is not worth the price 0X
I wouldn't be surprised if it was a lot cheaper in America. The Nissan 350Z in the UK is sold at a price that would be around $45,000 if directly equated to USD, whereas in the US, it's only $25,000.

Regardless, for £80k, you can get either a fully specced Porsche Carrera S, a fully laden M6, or for about £10k more, a fully specced AMV8.
__________________
Studio Gecko
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2005, 01:58 AM   #15
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default

Originally Posted by Sir_GT
Originally Posted by Johns
that shit is not worth the price 0X
I wouldn't be surprised if it was a lot cheaper in America. The Nissan 350Z in the UK is sold at a price that would be around $45,000 if directly equated to USD, whereas in the US, it's only $25,000.

Regardless, for £80k, you can get either a fully specced Porsche Carrera S, a fully laden M6, or for about £10k more, a fully specced AMV8.
or an ugly CLS55. I take the bimmer
__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump