01-05-2005, 11:42 AM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
|
SPEED RECORD BROKEN!!!
Welll , I hope this isn't a repost, but i just got the latest issue of evo, and the story is inside.
The F1 has been toppled by a only 1mph
From the evo site
|
It has taken almost ten years, but finally another road car has travelled faster than the McLaren F1's famous 240.1mph. The story of how the tiny German tuning company 9ff achieved the new record speed starts is fully explained in this month's issue.
|
__________________
|
|
|
01-05-2005, 12:06 PM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Slovakia
Posts: 1,782
|
repost, i posted it here about 2 weeks ago, look to the porsche news
|
|
|
01-05-2005, 12:09 PM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
|
 ops: ... I tried searching, just not hard enough
Admin
__________________
|
|
|
01-05-2005, 12:58 PM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
^^^^
well..... concidering this was done by a tuned car that is street legal...
the Sledgehammer Corvette hit 255 way before the Macca set its record.
|
|
|
01-05-2005, 01:20 PM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
|
Well evo made it out to be a world record, beating the McLaren.
I am confused as to the requirements to beat the F1... does the car have to be a production car, or can it be a car that is tuned, but buys parts from the manufacturer. So does 9ff buy only the parts it needs or does it use a donor car?
Very confusing, as i know that many american cars have gone faster on the salt-beds 0X
__________________
|
|
|
01-05-2005, 02:58 PM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,545
|
I also thought that only untuned cars are allowed to break the record... Confusing
|
|
|
01-05-2005, 06:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NoVA/Ohio, USA
Posts: 946
|
It also didn't break 240.1. The track radar said something like 241, but the on board GPS clocked about 10 mph less.
Unless the German Transit Authority considers this a production car (a la RUF) then I really don't think it could be considered in the recordbooks as having broken the record.
__________________

Xbox Live Gamertag: TheSlusbe
|
|
|
01-05-2005, 06:22 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
|
and it had to have its wipers, wing mirrors and have some other complication which i cant remember..... surely if its got no wipers or wing mirrors its not street legal??
Either way, nice one to 9ff for actually making it up there
|
|
|
01-05-2005, 06:43 PM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
|
|
Originally Posted by findleybeast
It also didn't break 240.1. The track radar said something like 241, but the on board GPS clocked about 10 mph less.
Unless the German Transit Authority considers this a production car (a la RUF) then I really don't think it could be considered in the recordbooks as having broken the record.
|
No... the GPS gave 241.1 ... exactly 1mph more than the Macca
__________________
|
|
|
01-05-2005, 10:14 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NoVA/Ohio, USA
Posts: 946
|
|
Originally Posted by thenumber1
No... the GPS gave 241.1 ... exactly 1mph more than the Macca 
|
well I haven't actually been able to dig up the original article about the Continental high speed test at Nardo (Evo 69), but here's a quote from Evo #72 (pg 90)
"...On Sunday mornings this stretch of autobahn that links Dortmund and Kassel is good for '350kph or so' (that's 216 mph) but at Nardo this 733bhp 9ff has hit 231mph."
Of course if they've done another test since then I can't really argue with that
edit: I found the original article. Specifics about the 9ff's times are on pg 102
http://www.motorworld.net/forum/showthread.php?t=12274
__________________

Xbox Live Gamertag: TheSlusbe
|
|
|
01-06-2005, 07:29 AM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
|
|
Originally Posted by findleybeast
Of course if they've done another test since then I can't really argue with that 
|
LOL... thay have made a new article. The issue came out about 2 days ago in the UK... might be a while until you get yours
__________________
|
|
|
01-06-2005, 11:01 AM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,062
|
I'm partial to say that 9ff's record doesn't count cuz it's a tuner car. Awesome car nonetheless. I'd like to read the whole evo article tho, and see what it says.
there's more of this controversy raging in another thread. "mclaren f1 speed record broken?" or something.
|
|
|
01-06-2005, 11:53 AM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
|
|
Originally Posted by ikon2003
I'm partial to say that 9ff's record doesn't count cuz it's a tuner car. Awesome car nonetheless. I'd like to read the whole evo article tho, and see what it says.
.
|
I can't scan articles, just photograph them... wait for TT's scan
__________________
|
|
|
01-06-2005, 01:20 PM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
im not suprised they went back already... if i recall correctly, the car was having problems with the fuel isystems at speed... couldn't deliver enough gas for swallowing at those huge speeds :shock:
|
|
|
01-06-2005, 03:48 PM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
|
It has to be a fully homologated production car to beat the Macca's record. Which means that there should be no modications made to the car, and the car should break the record "as is." (In the intended state that was meant for sale)
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|