Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat > Car Gallery



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2004, 06:53 PM   #1
Wutputt
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 3,371
Default New Merc M-class

Pics of the new the new Mercedes M-class (W164) were released last week. It will be presented at the Detroit Motorshow in January 2005 and will be produced in the Alabama (US) plant like the previous M-class. Mercedes new softroader will be at the dealers in the spring of 2005.

It will be available with the following engines:

ML 350: 3.5 V6 (269 hp)
ML 500: 5.0 V8 (288 hp)
ML 460: 4.6 V8 (326 hp) -> will probably replace the ML 500 somewhere in 2006
ML 550: 5.5 V8 (408 hp)
ML 63 AMG: 6.3 V8 (462 hp)
ML 280 CDI: 2.8 V6 (190 hp)
ML 320 CDI: 3.2 V6 (218 hp)
ML 400 CDI: 4.0 V8 (299 hp)

All engines will be linked to Mercedes 7-speed automatic, the 7G-Tronic.































source: autoweek.nl
Wutputt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 07:04 PM   #2
gottacatchup
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, Tx, learning in Ohio
Posts: 814
Default

Looks like another lazy designer, didn't even bother to change the headlights. Only noticable change i can see is the sharpening of the lines around the rear window and new foglights.
__________________
gottacatchup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 07:06 PM   #3
gobs3z
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,590
Default

Looks a lot better than the last one, but to bad it looks like a lexus.
__________________

"If we could read the secret histories of our enemies, we would find in each story enough sorrow and suffering to disarm all hostility." Longfellow
gobs3z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 08:07 PM   #4
vexor
Regular User
 
vexor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,600
Default

Originally Posted by gottacatchup
Looks like another lazy designer, didn't even bother to change the headlights. Only noticable change i can see is the sharpening of the lines around the rear window and new foglights.
It's probably the same guy that designed the "new" Porsche 997.
__________________
www.MGReviews.com
Car and Motorcycle Reviews & Photography
Facebook | Twitter| Instagram

vexor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 08:29 PM   #5
JiggaStyles09
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 709
Default

Originally Posted by vexor
Originally Posted by gottacatchup
Looks like another lazy designer, didn't even bother to change the headlights. Only noticable change i can see is the sharpening of the lines around the rear window and new foglights.
It's probably the same guy that designed the "new" Porsche 997.
lol i dont think its that bad, i like the subtle improvements, it looks more squared off now and muscular.
__________________
What good is Gas Mileage without Horsepower? That's why I bought a Saturn.
JiggaStyles09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 08:44 PM   #6
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

It looks like rubbish. The arse is the fat momma version of the new SLK, and roof over it looks like... well... a roof. From a house. In china.
__________________
Studio Gecko
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 08:47 PM   #7
MercedeSChink
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 443
Default

Lazy!? What are you talkin about man!? the changes are totally significant...the headlights are different style than the latest ones that the 163 has...also the interior is totally different, no more center console window buttons and different glove compartment...
__________________
2001 Mercedes ML55 - SOLD
2004 PUMAs
MercedeSChink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 08:50 PM   #8
Sir_GT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
Default

Originally Posted by MercedeSChink
Lazy!? What are you talkin about man!? the changes are totally significant...the headlights are different style than the latest ones that the 163 has...also the interior is totally different, no more center console window buttons and different glove compartment...
Aren't you happy you sold your M-class and learned a lesson?
Sir_GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-06-2004, 11:47 PM   #9
ae86_16v
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
Default

Originally Posted by vexor
Originally Posted by gottacatchup
Looks like another lazy designer, didn't even bother to change the headlights. Only noticable change i can see is the sharpening of the lines around the rear window and new foglights.
It's probably the same guy that designed the "new" Porsche 997.
Hahaha. . .

Looks very lexus like for sure. Especially the headlights.
ae86_16v is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004, 12:10 AM   #10
SilviaEvo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bellevue, Washington
Posts: 3,694
Default

those lazy germans! well i think it looks pretty good except the side shots because of that rear bumper and the tail lights which just screws it up
__________________
SilviaEvo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004, 12:15 AM   #11
gigdy
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
Default

The back looks much better then it used to.
__________________
gigdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004, 01:24 AM   #12
papaSMURF
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 51
Default

looks much less like a van from the back.. much different actually, just proportions are the same almost, c pillar angle is the same as the lexus. it almost looks smaller, but im sure it wouldnt be by much.

good design, probablly poor execution though
__________________
*93 FD3S* <- SOLD!
*98 VIII LSC* <- Will always be mine...
*2004 ???* <- HELP!
papaSMURF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004, 03:05 AM   #13
Vansquish
Regular User
 
Vansquish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA/ Bloomington, IN, USA
Posts: 2,624
Default

HAHAHAHAHA....Mercedes is trying to copy all the Asian manufacturers, the front end looks like a combination of a Lexus RX300 and a Kia Sorento and the exhaust looks like it's from a recent Acura MDX. Not to mention that the C-pillar looks a lot like the one on the Chrysler Pacifica....oy vey, the old one was bland, but at least it wasn't ugly.
__________________
me-- "Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't. Sometimes I feel like the moon is made of cheese"

my Hindibonics-speaking Indian roommate--"Dawgs, do you have any idea how much bacteria that would take?"
Vansquish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004, 04:48 AM   #14
blah
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
Default

Thank you mercedes. Not bad at all. Why are they phasing out the 500? is this a all across the board or just ML Class? the 5.0 liter should make more power and torque than a 4.6 liter when tuned to max, so why are they discontinuing it?
__________________
blah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2004, 06:29 AM   #15
SPEEDKILLAR
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Mercs had a chance to make a car closer to the lines of the X5 and Cayenne... but they've done it again... a dull and boring SUV. However... it looks much better than the old one.
Yup, totally agree.
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial

Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms

Blaire is a figleaf

Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.

Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar
SPEEDKILLAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump