| Video and Picture Links WORKING HTTP or FTP links only, no torrents or other P2P links. |
08-08-2004, 07:01 PM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nicosia, Cyprus
Posts: 861
|
Mercedes C63 AMG!!!!
the article is from the new car magazine!
|
|
|
|
08-08-2004, 07:09 PM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Toronto,Canada
Posts: 1,001
|
O my Jesus :shock: now there is a miny beast for the big beast (cl65) to team up and take over the world 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2004, 07:20 PM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Puebla
Posts: 1,660
|
Coming from Mercedes.. everything is possible 
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2004, 08:19 PM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Managua, Nicaragua
Posts: 1,509
|
now that is just plain dumb...come on enough is enough...6.3 C class....I can only imagine next gen mercs....stupid figures....
__________________
"You stick to building tractors and I will stick to building sports cars" -Enzo Ferrari to Ferruccio Lamborghini...
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2004, 09:59 PM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: HELL!
Posts: 890
|
More power is always good.
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2004, 10:13 PM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Athens, Georgia or Los Angeles
Posts: 345
|
No its not. The chassis of a car is designed for a particular amount of power. Overloading git gives you all kinds of problems (look at the CL65, or the morons who stuff V8's in Sevens). No, if you have a chassis designed for that kind of load, then were talking. 
__________________
Phil Hill, Kappa Sigma for life.
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2004, 10:39 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: HELL!
Posts: 890
|
MB doesnt just do a half ass job. If the chassis wasnt designed to support that they wouldnt of done it.
|
|
|
|
|
08-08-2004, 11:53 PM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,544
|
|
Originally Posted by SilviaS15Cwest
MB doesnt just do a half ass job. If the chassis wasnt designed to support that they wouldnt of done it.
|
i agree with that, its mercedes from whom we are talking. i dont think theyd do bad job... but remember the first audi TTs that rolled...
|
|
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 12:07 AM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bellevue, Washington
Posts: 3,694
|
wow i want one
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 08:15 AM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 627
|
I need one 
|
|
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 09:35 AM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,545
|
Wow, thats new for me. AMG is insane. The C55 is already not slow but how will this monster go :shock: 
|
|
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 10:40 AM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Quebec
Posts: 5
|
they sould put the E55 engine (V8 SC) to blow competition
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 04:22 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 141
|
6.3L V8 at front? What kind of handling character do you expect? When did MB get that idea from old school American big "V8 "striaght line" only sedan?
__________________
Ferrari Nuts!
|
|
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 04:37 PM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
|
Originally Posted by 3D_CARD
6.3L V8 at front? What kind of handling character do you expect? When did MB get that idea from old school American big "V8 "striaght line" only sedan?
|
Well Audis 4.2Litre V8 in the S4 weights the same as the old 2.7 V6. The new C55 seems to handle well according to journalists so a 6.3 Litre engine sounds ok to me.
|
|
|
|
|
08-09-2004, 05:44 PM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Santa Clarita, CA, USA
Posts: 2,539
|
Great another car from Merc where you cant have the traction controll off until your in 3rd gear. Ill take a M any day over this. Watch the M3 still beat if because of its lightweight.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
