05-14-2007, 05:59 PM
|
#16
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
|
|
Originally Posted by Skaala
remember that the M5 engine is at a very high state of tune, and the Audi V10TT at a much much lower.
|
:roflmao: :roflmao: :violin:
__________________
|
|
|
06-17-2007, 04:13 AM
|
#17
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,327
|
|
|
|
06-17-2007, 04:36 AM
|
#18
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
|
|
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
Impressive figures indeed. Too bad it isn't N/A.
Weight, +2000kg?
|
Because na's suck ass.
Give me a car supercharger or turbocharger any day of the week.
I love the audi rs6 i wonder what the tuners will do whit this car?
 8)
|
|
|
06-17-2007, 08:44 AM
|
#19
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
|
|
Originally Posted by pagani
I love the audi rs6 i wonder what the tuners will do whit this car?
 8)
|
Put Audi R8 "inspired" crap on it.
__________________
|
|
|
06-17-2007, 09:05 AM
|
#20
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
|
Can't wait to sse a review of this beast!
__________________
|
|
|
06-17-2007, 04:17 PM
|
#21
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
|
I want to see a RS6 by MTM
__________________
|
|
|
06-18-2007, 09:04 AM
|
#22
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 523
|
571 bhp sounds great...the noraml s6 weighs 1910kg, im thinking the rs6 will weigh btn 1940 and 1970 kgs ( M5 1830 kg, E 63 AMG 1840 kg)with the addition of those turbos and other stuff to make it handle...unless they decide to make some of the body panels out of lightweight materials to bring down weight which would be a gr8 idea considering how much lighter the M5 and E63 are
it's been a really slow couple of months for new cars, i hope this rs6 will be a first sign for good things to come.
|
|
|
06-18-2007, 12:36 PM
|
#23
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,327
|
|
|
|
06-18-2007, 02:54 PM
|
#24
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,327
|
|
|
|
06-18-2007, 03:11 PM
|
#25
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
|
Yeah it looks quite good apart from the rims
__________________
|
|
|
06-18-2007, 05:10 PM
|
#26
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
|
I don't really like it... the A6 always looked a bit fat  And the RS version isn't much better. I rather prefer the RS4!
__________________
|
|
|
06-19-2007, 01:49 AM
|
#27
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in the Philippines
Posts: 1,456
|
Hmmm... I like it apart from the fact that the last RS6 had wider rear flares. Flares are cool. 8)
|
|
|
06-19-2007, 04:30 AM
|
#28
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 40
|
Hmmm, looks good. But dont expect the new RS6 to blow out the M5. M5 dynos showed it has more than the listed 507hp (507 is a special number to BMW) and the M5 should be lighter. We'll see, but the RS6 does sound nice.
|
|
|
06-19-2007, 06:33 AM
|
#29
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,420
|
Am I the only one here not too convinced? Its ugly, its going to be bloated, its a huge engine over the front wheels, and it'll be a bit too much power. Give me an M5 or an E63 any day. :fist:
__________________
|
|
|
06-19-2007, 10:03 AM
|
#30
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
|
|
Originally Posted by ferrarif1fan89
Am I the only one here not too convinced? Its ugly, its going to be bloated, its a huge engine over the front wheels, and it'll be a bit too much power. Give me an M5 or an E63 any day. :fist:
|
Too much power?! Nah, I don't think so. It will be heavy, so....
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|