Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-10-2006, 07:14 AM   #16
leblanc2.0
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: O´Porto - Portugal
Posts: 292
Default

leblanc2.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 11:08 AM   #17
chest3r
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
Default

This Koenigsegg CCX looks a bit better than the previous one, but anyway it's like a Saab compared to the awesome Zonda F
__________________
chest3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 11:24 AM   #18
Ghostbat
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
Default

Originally Posted by chest3r
This Koenigsegg CCX looks a bit better than the previous one, but anyway it's like a Saab compared to the awesome Zonda F
Ehhh. No it's not..
Ghostbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 11:43 AM   #19
mv
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
Default

Ghostbat, I would like to know what a Swede makes of the ridiculous claims by Koenigsegg. 1/4 mile in 9s flat etc. Isn't it crap ?

We actually know it is. Since it does 200kph in 9.6 seconds, hence the real 1/4 mile time is about 11s. What a shame for Mr. Koenigsegg.
__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
mv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 11:55 AM   #20
Ghostbat
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
Default

Originally Posted by mv
Ghostbat, I would like to know what a Swede makes of the ridiculous claims by Koenigsegg. 1/4 mile in 9s flat etc. Isn't it crap ?

We actually know it is. Since it does 200kph in 9.6 seconds, hence the real 1/4 mile time is about 11s. What a shame for Mr. Koenigsegg.
Why would I make something different of it than others??

Check out their homepage for the correct claim. They don't mention a 0-200km/h. Only the quartermile in 9sec @ 235km/h

http://www.koenigsegg.com/thecars/index.asp?submenu=4
Ghostbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 12:09 PM   #21
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

I am curious to know what the CCX really is, it seems longer than the CCR, has different wheels and brakes. It it's the US version, why didn't they present it at the Detroit salon ??
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2006, 08:08 PM   #22
crazidude
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver, Canada BC
Posts: 1,084
Default

The F roadster . I'm getting all giddy even though I can't afford one .
crazidude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 10:25 AM   #23
McLaren4eVa
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 510
Default

Damn That Zonda is Fukin Sexc Bludy Hell If Thee Normal Zonda F Costs 400K How Much Will The Roadster Be? Guess Its A Stupid Question Cant Afford It Anyway
__________________
McLaren4eVa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 04:37 PM   #24
mv
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
Default

Originally Posted by Ghostbat
Originally Posted by mv
Ghostbat, I would like to know what a Swede makes of the ridiculous claims by Koenigsegg. 1/4 mile in 9s flat etc. Isn't it crap ?

We actually know it is. Since it does 200kph in 9.6 seconds, hence the real 1/4 mile time is about 11s. What a shame for Mr. Koenigsegg.
Why would I make something different of it than others??

Check out their homepage for the correct claim. They don't mention a 0-200km/h. Only the quartermile in 9sec @ 235km/h

http://www.koenigsegg.com/thecars/index.asp?submenu=4
I knew exactly what they claim and I call it rubbish.

It has been tested in SA. It hit 200kph in 9.6 seconds. Hence the 1/4 mile in 9 seconds at 235kph is incorrect. Btw cars that hit 200kph in about 9.5 seconds do the 1/4 mile in about 11s.
__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
mv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2006, 08:52 PM   #25
twboy1999
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: toronto,
Posts: 2,393
Default

fuck
zonda f so fucking sexy
__________________
ferrari freak
i am a porn addict
twboy1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2006, 09:19 PM   #26
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

Originally Posted by chest3r
This Koenigsegg CCX looks a bit better than the previous one, but anyway it's like a Saab compared to the awesome Zonda F
Wasn't the Koenigsegg once the fastest production car?
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 06:02 AM   #27
vexor
Regular User
 
vexor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,600
Default

Wasn't the Koenigsegg once the fastest production car?
still is.... officially
__________________
www.MGReviews.com
Car and Motorcycle Reviews & Photography
Facebook | Twitter| Instagram

vexor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2006, 07:50 AM   #28
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

Not officially ... yet I guess that Bugatti or an magazine won't be long before officially clocking it But there are other contenders like Saleen too ...
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 07:52 PM   #29
mv
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
Default

Two new pics of the CCX have emerged - it probably is the best looking Koenigsegg yet.



__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
mv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 07:59 PM   #30
Ghostbat
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
Default

Looks just sick in black! Thanks for the pics mv.
Ghostbat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump