Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2005, 08:10 AM   #16
caneswell
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 259
Default

Originally Posted by T5
Althought this car is a engeniering archievement in every way.
The car was meant to be heavy because of his luxury interior and that dificults even more the archievement of performance figures like 400km/h,fast acceleration or even good dynamics.
The tecnology gain in this project will be very useful for future really hardcore supercars.
The Mclaren f1 had leather, air conditioning and a stereo...... and luggage space and an extra seat. What more luxary do you need? And what the hell is this luxury made of to weigh the 800kg difference? I'm pretty sure thats not the reason it's so much heavier.
__________________
"If everything seems under control then you're just not going fast enough"
caneswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 08:30 AM   #17
mindgam3
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
Default

Stupid amounts of torque means you've got to make the whole drivetrain bullet proof and therefore very heavy - gearbox, clutch, shafts, the lot. Plus its got 4WD, a 8 litre engine and 4 turbos which all need intercoolers etc etc, not hard to see where all the weight comes from, but whats the point when the power to weight is only slightly more than an enzo? Yet in the corners its going to be only half as good, especially that as any downforce it does create will have minimal effects on something that heavy....

And as caneswell said, the Zonda, CCR, McLaren F1, CGT all have luxury interirors and the Enzo has all you could need.....
mindgam3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 09:03 AM   #18
DeMoN
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
Default

It might cost the same as a McLaren, but I think most people would rather have the McLaren. I wonder why no one else has tried to make a supercar 3 seats.
__________________
Guess who's Back!
DeMoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 09:18 AM   #19
T5
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 127
Default

A veyron doesn´t have the same objective as the Mclaren.
Mclaren was a supercar designed for performance,in the other hand we have the veyron that was designed to be a compromise between luxury,design and performance.
This compromise takes this car to a level of a SuperGT(Gran Turismo) not to a Supercar level.
T5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 12:57 PM   #20
mindgam3
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Well, you've talked about the power, the weight, the corner speed... but how about the brakes??? Stopping a 1990kg 400kmh car is not that easy! What do they use? 400mm carbon discs with 10-pistons callipers???
400mm front discs according to EVO, doesent state if they are carbon ceramic or not though.

A nice little quote from Dr Bscher:

"The Veyron has a lot to live up to, the McLaren F1 was built to a fantastic standard using the finest possible materials. I'd never claim that we're building a car that will surpass even the F1 in this area"
mindgam3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 01:01 PM   #21
DeMoN
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
Default

^ but yet it costs the same as one?
__________________
Guess who's Back!
DeMoN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 01:04 PM   #22
T5
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 127
Default

Bugatti never was a cheap brand..... :shock:
T5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 01:28 PM   #23
caneswell
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 259
Default

Originally Posted by T5
Bugatti never was a cheap brand..... :shock:
That was when they made cars that were better than the competition!
__________________
"If everything seems under control then you're just not going fast enough"
caneswell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2005, 01:34 PM   #24
T5
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 127
Default

Define Better....
The EB110 wasn´t the best of them all,but still one of the best cars available in the market when it was launched.
T5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2005, 06:42 PM   #25
neilo63
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 434
Default

Awesome i want to see this finally hit the roads. What an uber GT!
neilo63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 02:51 AM   #26
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Awesome i want to see this finally hit the roads. What an uber GT!
does anybody know the expected production run? i tend to think a sighting of a Veyron will be as rare as a macca.... fewer then 100 in the world makes for a hard target to find.
albiet im not a big fan of this car, im definately interested in it emphatically
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 03:09 AM   #27
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

first i heard about this car was over 2 years ago in an F1 magazine i think. Then again in Road and Track when they were talking about someone nearly stuffing the only road going prototype at Laguna Seca :shock:

i didn't think it was actually goin gto make it to production, but i'm glad it is I have a feeling TT will be on a lifelong mission to capture one when it hits the streets
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2005, 05:07 AM   #28
mv
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
Default

Originally Posted by mindgam3
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Well, you've talked about the power, the weight, the corner speed... but how about the brakes??? Stopping a 1990kg 400kmh car is not that easy! What do they use? 400mm carbon discs with 10-pistons callipers???
400mm front discs according to EVO, doesent state if they are carbon ceramic or not though.
I've read somewhere they are carbon ceramic and I would be really taken aback if they weren't.
__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
mv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 12:29 PM   #29
mindgam3
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,279
Default

so much for your inside information regarding the weight eh everso?
mindgam3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2005, 01:19 PM   #30
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

almost every piece of "inside information" i've revealed before on JW has been true in the past. there are people on JW who can testify to this....so no judgement yet. the car hasn't been released
^^
i'll say. it also wouldnt be the first time a car had something more (in this case less wieght is more) then what is claimed
also, thanks for the production run numbers... gives me a little more hope to see this car sometime besides an auto show
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump