Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > General Discussion > Video and Picture Links

Video and Picture Links WORKING HTTP or FTP links only, no torrents or other P2P links.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2009, 08:37 PM   #1
pagani
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
Thumbs up Street Racing 280z rb25, s2000 gt35r, c6 z06 501rwhp

Cool street racing video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMdFOWkuXRY'
pagani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 08:52 PM   #2
Strop
Regular User
 
Strop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rio - Brazil
Age: 37
Posts: 253
Default

Cool vid!

That is why i still say: an S2000 doesn't need a V8 swap...hehehe
Strop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 09:10 PM   #3
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by Strop View Post
Cool vid!

That is why i still say: an S2000 doesn't need a V8 swap...hehehe
Except a normally aspirated V8 swap is cheaper, lighter and more reliable as the motor is less stressed
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2009, 09:29 PM   #4
Strop
Regular User
 
Strop's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rio - Brazil
Age: 37
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by RC45 View Post
Except a normally aspirated V8 swap is cheaper, lighter and more reliable as the motor is less stressed
Cheaper tham put a turbo kit in a S2000?(and some extras)...i really don't know how much a V8 cost there.

And lighter than a F20c??

I agree with the reliability.


And a V8 would ruin the close 50/50 weight distribution of the S2k.
Strop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 01:39 AM   #5
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by Strop View Post
Cheaper tham put a turbo kit in a S2000?(and some extras)...i really don't know how much a V8 cost there.
Complete 400bhp LS6/LS2 would be $5000 incuding hardware.

Originally Posted by Strop View Post

And lighter than a F20c??

I agree with the reliability.


And a V8 would ruin the close 50/50 weight distribution of the S2k.
We have gone over the weight issue already, an LSx is abotu 150lbs heavier than the S2000 motor. Now figure in the turbo plumbing, intercooler etc and you are already addig weight to the nose and turning the already peaky motor into a turbo lag hairdryer

V8 = instant torque...
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2009, 01:39 PM   #6
silentm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Basel, CH
Posts: 1,865
Default

not when the other guy in hte faster car is getting away from you in the corner exits
__________________
"Some say that the outline of his left nipple is exactly the same shape as the Nürburgring, and that if you give him a really important job to do, he'll skive off and play croquet... all we know is, he's called the Stig."

The Top Gear Wikiquote
silentm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 01:11 PM   #7
gigdy
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
Default

Originally Posted by Strop View Post
Cheaper tham put a turbo kit in a S2000?(and some extras)...i really don't know how much a V8 cost there.

And lighter than a F20c??

I agree with the reliability.


And a V8 would ruin the close 50/50 weight distribution of the S2k.
Quality turbo s2k can top 10k easily.
__________________
gigdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 12:55 AM   #8
10000rpmlover
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the US of A, sometimes also London
Posts: 466
Default

so... where is the RX-7 with the 20B swap?

I'd love to see one of those versus a GTR... but that is just me and my rotary fanboy inside talking, the guy driving the vette sucks as a driver...
__________________

twin turbo, AWD, AWS, 6spd, drop dead gorgeous, what's not to like? mitsubishi should go back and make these again
10000rpmlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 01:04 PM   #9
silentm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Basel, CH
Posts: 1,865
Default

i'm not going to disagree with you but i like the fact that someone is doing something different with his S2K.

The differences is what makes cars so interesting.


you saying this kind of confuses me, because it's obvious that people will increase the power of their car rather by fiddling with what they have got, instead of actually axchanging the engine of their car. so you would statistically have more people with an upgraded engine than e.g. let's say the V8 swap which (and i think you can agree with me here) is more unique that the turbo or supercharger.

i understand where you are coming from, it is your oppinion and belief that the engine that the car comes with is put there because it is the perfect match for it and thus makes the car what it is. and by changing the most important thing about the car (the engine) you are taking out the heart or even the soul of the car. that's all fine and dandy, but then we have joe here who really loves the car as it is but wants something extra. inherently i find nothing wrong with and i really like seeing (i mean hearing) e.g. an S2K with that V8 sound.

to me that is a more unique car and experience than the turbo that was bolted on to the stock motor.

is it better? i don't know i haven't driven the car but i simply find nothing wrong with it
__________________
"Some say that the outline of his left nipple is exactly the same shape as the Nürburgring, and that if you give him a really important job to do, he'll skive off and play croquet... all we know is, he's called the Stig."

The Top Gear Wikiquote
silentm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump