Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > General Discussion > Video and Picture Links

Video and Picture Links WORKING HTTP or FTP links only, no torrents or other P2P links.



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-29-2007, 05:26 PM   #31
tforth
Regular User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,092
Default

If you read my note, I said that BMW engines achieve good specific efficiency, with the exception of the M cars. That being said comapre an 'old' M3 against any other 3500 lb car with a good size truck and usable rear seats that performs anywhere near it... Remember, a corvette doesn't have any of these 'useful' burdens...
tforth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2007, 12:35 PM   #32
Phoenix60
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2
Default

Originally Posted by brembo
Originally Posted by 79TA
Anyway, a smallblock chevy tends to have much more potential (or atleast potential per dollar) than anything offered by BMW. This is because BMW's generally are offered in a higher state of tune in stock form.

I am aware there is potential in the American engines thats the whole point, there is tons of potential, the manufactors of the engines just dont use that potential like Europeans does...

And of course there is higher potential in a higher deplacment engine that goes without saying, but if that potential aint even scratched why not use a smaller deplacment engine wich is more efficient, lighter and gets a better fuel economy?

Im not talking just about the Z06, FGT or the Viper here this goes across the line....

Lol Like the E46 M3? 333hp, and 18mpg, compared to 400hp, and 30mpg? Its amazing that litle 6 can soak up that much fuel on the highway.
Phoenix60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump