Another Pentagon hit video

[graywolf624]

3 pages ago I showed you a website that explicitly explains the location of the part. Its the center of the rotating disc. The propellor blades have disintegrated and this is whats left.


Seems to match up pretty well to me.

Also this appears to match


The above are all parts from the rolls royce engine on a 757. These do not even come close to matching the engine for the global hawk.

[saadie]

okay that proves one thing ...
but where is the other engine ?...
a very simmilar engine is used in the global hawk ..
http://911review.org/Sept11Wiki/GlobalHawk.shtml

why is there no sing of wings or tail section ....
these parts survive because they are torn away ..
757 is a big aircraft .. the rubble seems small
why is the hole in the building soo small ...

you saw how the planes penetrated the towers ... the fuselarge and 'wings' penetrated the building .. the case is not the same in the pentagon crash ...

[SPEEDKILLAR]

Some of the parts are planted there to make it look good, I mean, those guys aren't that stupid, they know people are going to ask questions, so they would have thought about that before hand.

They should have used more explosives, and make a bigger hole, somebody fucked up.

[graywolf624]

a very simmilar engine is used in the global hawk .. http://911review.org/Sept11Wiki/GlobalHawk.shtml

Yes but its 3/4 of that size and the article I posted has a man from rolls indiana where the global hawk is made saying the part matches nothing out of his plant.
The 757 is made in the UK by a different division of the company.

why is there no sing of wings or tail section .... these parts survive because they are torn away .. 757 is a big aircraft .. the rubble seems small why is the hole in the building soo small ...

Go back and look at the picture of the tehran accident i posted or the plane into the cement wall from popular mechanics. In neither case do you see any sign of the wings and tail section. They disintegrated on impact. Your talking an item full of jet fuel and made of mostly aluminum and fiberglass hitting a bunker. Not much is going to be left of the plane.

you saw how the planes penetrated the towers ... the fuselarge and 'wings' penetrated the building .. the case is not the same in the pentagon crash ...

The similarities in construction of the two are not even close. One is a solid cement wall a few stories tall with fortefied walls and blast windows designed to resist external explosions.
The second is a 110 story building designed around a steel beam frame. It wasn't designed to withstand a hit from anything. It was just meant to support its weight. One, the pentagon, was just further reinfoced through renovation. The other has 30 year old fire proofing and steel beams.

A fast moving object hits a t shaped object at the cross of the t versus hitting the center of a staight wall. Its an entirely different concept.

[graywolf624]

Some of the parts are planted there to make it look good, I mean, those guys aren't that stupid, they know people are going to ask questions, so they would have thought about that before hand.

When looking at the evidence in pictures this is just about the last leg a conspiracy theorist could stand on.. The problem is, that still leaves hundreds of people that saw what happend first hand. You can see the pentagon from the highway.. Its not like its hidden.

[RC45]

Originally Posted by saadie you know nothing about this part of the world except for the stuff you see in the news ... leave that apart ok .. cuz all you've said in your post is crap and you know it you dont know me or my daddy ... trust me on this one .... i guess you are one of those wannabe american bully huh ... attacking poeple on the net but its on with me

Who said anything about being in or around America ?

I know far more about "your part of the world" than you realise.

Far more...

[ViperASR]

Originally Posted by saadie Originally Posted by graywolf624 Did anyone atall knew anyone on any of those planes that went down on that day .. You really should read the posts above. I told you already I knew someone who watched the airliner hit the pentagon. what proof dose he have .... my question was ... dose anyone Personally know one of the passangers who died in the crash

yes. learn some respect. for a 19 year old ur acting alot like a spoiled little 16 year old girl

[666fast]

you saw how the planes penetrated the towers ... the fuselarge and 'wings' penetrated the building .. the case is not the same in the pentagon crash ...

This only proves one of two things:

1. You are dumber than a box of rocks and won't listen to any reasonable explanation since it completely invalidates what you want the truth to be

or

2. You are doing this on purpose to try and get a rise out of everyone.

Regardless of what it is, it's incredibly immature on your part.


This is what I see in your posts:
"You prove it, you prove it, you are wrong and I'm right, you prove it, I have zero evidence to back up my claims but I'm right because I say so."

This is exactly how children argue.

[Mattk]

To be perfectly honest, I find this whole conspiracy theory business to be incredibly disrespectful to all those who were affected by the September 11 attacks. There is plenty of eyewitness and forensic evidence to back up the attacks. Al Qaeda claimed responsibility and we know of their detailed plans for that day. There was no conspiracy.

[ViperASR]

Originally Posted by Mattk To be perfectly honest, I find this whole conspiracy theory business to be incredibly disrespectful to all those who were affected by the September 11 attacks.

+1

[TopGearNL]

Originally Posted by ViperASR Originally Posted by Mattk To be perfectly honest, I find this whole conspiracy theory business to be incredibly disrespectful to all those who were affected by the September 11 attacks. +1

+2!