01-09-2007, 03:10 AM
|
#46
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
|
Originally Posted by bmw06m6
See it takes three years to launch all the models for the 3 series though. Hell we just got the convert. and the M3 isn't out yet. After this BMW will unveil a special car, they've always done this, when they got done redesigning all the models in the 90 s they topped it off with the Z8 Thats how the M1 came to be, Next Year? Z10! Then they start over flagship model first then work they're way down they have added a large coupe in there as well which is why they came out with it in 2004 later then it was suppose to after the 5er.
So it goes, later this year M3, this fall you could see a Z10 maybe next spring. Then Year by Year 7 Series, X6, 5 Series, Z4, Z1, 6 Series, X3, 3 Series, 1 Series, X5, Z16.
|
well, the 7,5,6 release was fucked up anyway thanks to the fact that the stockholders were screaming for the E65. I think the 7 was released about a year too early. That's why the E60 didn't have anywhere near the problems the E65 did because BMW had to field test the damn thing instead of doing their full R&D on it.
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
|
01-09-2007, 09:29 AM
|
#47
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-09-2007, 10:23 AM
|
#48
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
|
Yeah, the original M5 wheels look better, but those new rear lights are pretty cool 8)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-09-2007, 11:24 AM
|
#49
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,327
|
looks cool! does it have the same specs as the sedan? no power upgrade  hopefully no manual for this one...
|
|
|
|
|
01-09-2007, 11:39 AM
|
#50
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Finland
Posts: 633
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-09-2007, 12:05 PM
|
#51
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
|
M6 wheels on M5 Touring looks weird 
Not ugly but just weird 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 03:43 PM
|
#52
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 1,835
|
550i with 408bhp from a 4.4-litre twin-turbo V8...isn't that a low hp figure? BMW should be able to get 408bhp without TT??
__________________
"Driving the R8 is like smearing honey into Keira Knightly!" - Jeremy Clarkson
"In principle, this car is too fast for my thoughts!" (Walter Röhrl about the 600+hp Audi S1 Sport)
|
|
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 03:55 PM
|
#53
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
|
Originally Posted by Skaala
550i with 408bhp from a 4.4-litre twin-turbo V8...isn't that a low hp figure? BMW should be able to get 408bhp without TT??
|
BMW has a tendency to be very conservative with their bhp-figures and they propably don't want it to step in too much on the M5:s territory. Marketing you know.
|
|
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 04:22 PM
|
#54
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
ugh, would someone please lock this thread? it never should have been started in the first place
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 04:30 PM
|
#55
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: MA, USA
Posts: 226
|
ew the front headlights look like the current X3 and the rear looks like a cheap hyundai its gross.. BMW heres to u :fist:
__________________
02 Honda CBR 954 RR
|
|
|
|
|
01-31-2007, 04:31 PM
|
#56
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
|
Originally Posted by Firdosh7747
ew the front headlights look like the current X3 and the rear looks like a cheap hyundai its gross.. BMW heres to u :fist:
|
did you not bother to read this thread? It's a shitty photoshop of an imagined car.
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
