Video and Picture Links WORKING HTTP or FTP links only, no torrents or other P2P links. |
11-05-2006, 06:34 PM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
|
Looks the deal, only wonder If I would go for this or the Shelby?
__________________
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 06:41 PM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Posts: 955
|
How heavy is it? I'm guessing, very heavy or it has poor gearing, since it has all that power yet doesn't cut the 5 second mark...
__________________
My new car: MB SLK55 AMG (36months, 40,000miles and still flawless)
My old car: MB SLK230K Brabus - sold
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 06:42 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,120
|
Originally Posted by TopGearNL
Looks the deal, only wonder If I would go for this or the Shelby? 
|
Neither
__________________

"plus being able call your penis master chief during sex has got to be comical at least once"-gis
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 06:48 PM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: huddersfield, England
Posts: 1,230
|
The Shelby GT500 for me please, but then again I bet the roush is alot better to drive. Hmm Im divided.
__________________
The ST is gone, Type-R is here!
The Type-R is gone, the MR2 is here!
The MR2 is dead, The S2000 is here!
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 07:59 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 523
|
id rather get the roush...interior is far better on 'that' car than the shelby's
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 08:31 PM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
Wow....415hp and 0-60 in 5+ seconds.....Those mustangs must be eating grass somewhere.
__________________
|
|
|
11-05-2006, 08:58 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
Originally Posted by fordgt84
id rather get the roush...interior is far better on 'that' car than the shelby's
|
actually, its about 1% better then the standard Mustang GT.
roush is almost a joke in terms of tuner-manufacturer IMO
415 hp... it ought to do 4.5 to 60 mph, as the 300 (320) mustang GT can hit 60 in 5.0 seconds with the standard rear end ratios, and not even the 'drag pack'
anyway, I've seen teh stage 3 up close, and am not impressed like i am with the Saleen stangs
|
|
|
11-07-2006, 01:58 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 523
|
Originally Posted by nthfinity
Originally Posted by fordgt84
id rather get the roush...interior is far better on 'that' car than the shelby's
|
actually, its about 1% better then the standard Mustang GT.
roush is almost a joke in terms of tuner-manufacturer IMO
415 hp... it ought to do 4.5 to 60 mph, as the 300 (320) mustang GT can hit 60 in 5.0 seconds with the standard rear end ratios, and not even the 'drag pack'
anyway, I've seen teh stage 3 up close, and am not impressed like i am with the Saleen stangs
|
its not that much faster to 60 mph, but as you gather speed im pretty sure u'll be leaving a mustang gt driver for dead...saleens are cool but the back end of the s281 destroys the rest of the car's look
|
|
|
11-07-2006, 02:17 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
|
After seeing the Good the Bad & The Ugly by JC I would take the Roush now, at least they made a complete car by not only modding the engine, but the full package !
__________________
|
|
|
11-07-2006, 02:57 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 2,670
|
the roush is a good all around package. the GT500 has more history behind it. pick you weapon
__________________
|
|
|
11-07-2006, 03:26 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
yep after seen it in the JC vid.. I like it.. sounds like a great package (never heard of it before the vid..) but the Shelby looks a lot better.. i wonder whats the price difference..
__________________
Things worth having don't come easy..
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|