They arent for you, most definatly.
These LCDs are part of their Pro-line. Pro being professionals who work on a Mac, make obsene amounts of money & dont mind to pay a bit more if it makes their lives easier and make their output a bit better. Creative pros arent generally known to be techies & their strengths lay in producing content.
What is your category for "best"? Tech specs? Awards? Conveniences?
Are BMWs the best cars in the world? RC & others may not agree with you.
I dont think the Cinema Dispalys are the "tech specs" best but I can appreciate where the premium goes too. For my personal application I'd still go for a Dell LCD. It has almost all the inputs I currently need without the price premium for conveniences I can live without & wont appreciate plugged into a PC.
Here's a link to a
2651" HDTV that costs $28 million. Does the hefty price tag warrant the screen size? Those who want to sit 550 feet away from it would appreciate it if they had the money.
|
Originally Posted by SFDMALEX
So big price = rich?
Im sorry but thats a fucked up way of thinking.
Lets say Im rich. Looking to purchase a screen. Does this mean I go and buy an Apple Cinema?
No. If Im rich Ill buy the best product.
The Apple Cinema display is not the best product. There are a lot of other higher spec displays out there.
So once again, what are you trying say?
What I implying with my topic is why is the big premium when its not the highest spec nor does it offer any significant features over the competition? I dont mind to pay to play, but why pay for no play?
|
Threaded Mode
