Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2005, 11:21 PM   #16
graywolf624
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
Default

As far as I know, the bigger the rim, the bigger the wheel = more grip... but thats the end of story.
Not really true. Wider wheels = larger foot print. Larger diameter wheels do not equal bigger footprint. Instead you get a change in the shape of the footprint. (perhaps a slight increase in foot print.. but thats mainly a minor side effect. It isnt proportional as in a width increase, but it does exist since a tire is not a rigid structure. Read my article on tires posted here some time ago for more info.
Thats why in drag cars (non top fuel) the rule is generally small diameter and as wide as possible.


)... the braking distance that will increase is almost meaningless; doesn't it?
those are the kind of calculations that you consider zero or simply don't care.
They are more significant then you think.
You can use this tool http://www.csgnetwork.com/multirpmcalc.html
to calculate the difference youll see in rpm at a given mph.

There are only 3 real reasons to go with larger diameter wheels..of varying degrees of importance.
1) clearance for larger brakes.
2) looks
3) higher top speed all other factors equal.
graywolf624 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2005, 11:39 PM   #17
antonioledesma
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Guadalajara, Mexico
Posts: 2,306
Default

^^ thanks a lot for the link!! needed one some months ago, but not now

and yes, they are more significant than I thought, of course I would not consider them, but you, vansquish and zrfk are the know-all for cars and can consider this factors
antonioledesma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2005, 12:46 AM   #18
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

Originally Posted by graywolf624
3) higher top speed all other factors equal.
I don't think u will have a higer top speed......(conservation of energy)
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2005, 01:20 AM   #19
sentra_dude
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,610
Default

Originally Posted by 5vz-fe
Originally Posted by graywolf624
3) higher top speed all other factors equal.
I don't think u will have a higer top speed......(conservation of energy)
lol...its called having a larger circumference, in effect changing your gearing. Why do you think you have to re-calibrate your speedo when you change wheel size? For each revolution of a larger wheel you go farther...
__________________

------------
1992 Toyota Celica GT 5spd, intake.
sentra_dude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2005, 02:15 AM   #20
Vansquish
Regular User
 
Vansquish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA/ Bloomington, IN, USA
Posts: 2,624
Default

Originally Posted by sentra_dude
Originally Posted by 5vz-fe
Originally Posted by graywolf624
3) higher top speed all other factors equal.
I don't think u will have a higer top speed......(conservation of energy)
lol...its called having a larger circumference, in effect changing your gearing. Why do you think you have to re-calibrate your speedo when you change wheel size? For each revolution of a larger wheel you go farther...
Right...but you're neglecting the higher moment of inertia of the wheel and the fact that it actually takes more energy to get it rolling. All in all unless you manage to increase the diameter of the wheel without increasing the moment of inertia of the wheel (i.e. by using a lighter-weight material or redistributing the masses of the wheel so that they lie closer to the hub) then you will in fact lower the top speed of the car. That it takes more energy to move an object with a larger moment of inertia is I think what 5vz-fe was trying to say. Indeed this is the case.

On a slightly different note, one of the other things you have to include when doing top-speed calculations is the fact that there is a fair amount of tire-growth depending on how fast you're moving. In the Mclaren F1, it accounted for something like 5-10mph total in their calculations (simulations showed it would probably max out at 225-230mph, but we know it actually can go faster)
__________________
me-- "Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't. Sometimes I feel like the moon is made of cheese"

my Hindibonics-speaking Indian roommate--"Dawgs, do you have any idea how much bacteria that would take?"
Vansquish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2005, 03:56 AM   #21
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

Thanks for typing all that out for me Vanquish.

On a side note, as long as u manage to pull down the same (wheel) horsepower with the larger wheel on a dyno, it will provide u with the SAME top speed. (As Vanquish, higher inertia is a mean of power loss thus it will show up on dyno as part of ur drivetrain loss). Of course, all this is under the assumption that the car is not having a redline limited topspeed.
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2005, 05:39 AM   #22
23790554
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 520
Default

wouldn;'t bigger wheels be more stable at higher speed?

bigger wheels is also more sexy
__________________
lier, lier, pants on fire
23790554 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2005, 06:32 AM   #23
Iwan
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paris / Zurich
Posts: 136
Default

Originally Posted by 23790554
bigger wheels is also more sexy
don't know if i can agree to this if you look at those freaks here.

i think 19/20 inch for 'normal' cars is the maximum - but i remember
back to the early 90's. in those days, 17 inch was the 'maximum'.....


cheers,
iwan
Iwan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump