10-05-2003, 11:26 PM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
OK.. dont say 56k warn unless you mean it!!
like in this pic!
8)
:arrow:
Click the pic for the high-res version
this is high res..
(if i could upload pics i would show you much better eg.. and higher res too)
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 12:21 AM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,901
|
wohh..thats huge 
__________________
Two rules for life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 05:32 AM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Nice, but where's the meaning of this? To see that kind of pic you need to save and resize it to something normal..
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 07:09 AM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
|
Originally Posted by TT
Nice, but where's the meaning of this? To see that kind of pic you need to save and resize it to something normal..
|
na... what are you running? 800x600 ? i hope not...  ops:
thats the best size pics... and they look GR8 when you print them.. that kinda of size pics are media pics... the best pics there is..
resizing in my idea is a sin! when it comes to pic the higher the better the more the merrier!
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 07:24 AM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solihull - UK
Posts: 502
|
|
Originally Posted by Erez_Avital
resizing in my idea is a sin! when it comes to pic the higher the better the more the merrier!
|
True for printing but not for web on screen viewing.
__________________
|| Canon 20D x2 | 17-40L | 24-70L | 100 USM Macro | 100-400L IS | 580EX ||
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 07:28 AM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Exactly.. so next time just post a link 
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 08:56 AM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
ah... i guess...
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 09:00 AM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 740
|
Huge 
link is better sometimes
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 10:03 AM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 489
|
I think what people are getting at is that the image when its like 1.5MB in size and is often over 4X the size of most people's resolution settings it can take well over a minute to download and with the image so large you cant enjoy the entire image at once.
I took your photo and choped and resized it a few ways. Basicly got the size way down and much more managable for people to view.
http://www.vafishfreek.com/temp/2004...024-croped.jpg
http://www.vafishfreek.com/temp/2004...STi_1-1024.jpg
Both of those are approx 120-125KB in size vs the approx 1.5MB for the origonal.
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 12:29 PM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ankara, Turkey
Posts: 558
|
Yes.. Huge size pics are unneccessary.. All of them can be resized less than 500kb.. As the fishfreek does..
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 03:26 PM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
well thats what yuo need.. what i have is like 10GB of official media pics and
if you dont have use for media pics then i wont post any... no prob.. i guess
you people still aren't ready for it..
i can get you more then planty of smaller pics... but i like my pics HIGH-RES!
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 03:28 PM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
That's not us not beeing ready and BTW, even a 1600x1200 screen will be to small for this pics...
I was simply trying to let you know there is no need for such big pics on a message board.. look, the page is complely messed up with it and you can barely understand it's an Impreza..
Those media pics are meant to be printed, not showed like that on a monitor dude...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 03:32 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia USA
Posts: 489
|
At 4064X2704 the image is 4X larger than one of the most common resolutions for home computers.
Whats so good about only being able to see 1/4th of the image at any given time.
__________________
PM me if your in the need for high speed affordable video hosting.
Free Photo Hosting
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 04:55 PM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 210
|
Man, I think I can see the pores on the nose of that woman driver at that resolution.
Sheesh, what size can you print that full size graphic up to, anyway?
__________________
Ed Mar
1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP
40th Anniversary Daytona 500 Pace Car Replica
#812/1500
|
|
|
|
|
10-06-2003, 05:58 PM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
now its great!! the click on pic to see full size... thats great!!
anyway.. so i wont post that high pics... no prob... :roll:
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
