07-19-2004, 12:15 AM
|
#16
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,670
|
thought they were limited to 2.0L engines?!?!
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 12:18 AM
|
#17
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
|
|
Originally Posted by hemi_fan
thought they were limited to 2.0L engines?!?!
|
Well, keeping it under 2.0 is to undercut certain taxing brackets in Japan. But I believe they are now aiming at the under 2.4L displacement bracket.
Afterall, 2.3 280hp should be better than 2.0 280hp rite? To me, the more low-end grunt the better.
__________________
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 12:36 AM
|
#18
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
|
Originally Posted by X-ale
Are they gonna go WRC  Whooo that'd be good... The only way to say they are better than the mitsu & sub's is to go to war on their battlefield...  Maybe for 2007/2008... 
|
I doubt Ford would go for that idea.
You have to realize that they have Mazda 6's with engines over 2.0L
They have the 2.3 and 3.0 engines, 170hp in the 2.3 and 220 in the 3.0
Japan puts out cars over that hp limit all the time they just don't sell them in Japan they sell them in Europe and North/South America
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 01:27 AM
|
#19
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bellevue, Washington
Posts: 3,694
|
a nice sleeper but keep engine change body
__________________
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 02:18 AM
|
#20
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA/ Bloomington, IN, USA
Posts: 2,624
|
|
Originally Posted by Ziploc
isn't 276bhp a lil low for a twin TCed 2.3 six-pot?
|
Just so you know, the 2.3 is actually an inline 4 with a balancer shaft or two (can't remember how many hehe). Despite that, in stock trim it makes 160bhp, so getting 276bhp from it shouldn't be that hard...certainly ought to be upgradeable to something significantly higher.
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 02:29 AM
|
#21
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
well considering you can make 100+ hp with a turbo/intercooler kit for the Focus 2.3 (same engine) It's very reasonable, just add the Turbo change the cams, timing, fuel map, exhaust, compression, etc... I can see this HP rating insight.
|
|
|
07-19-2004, 02:37 AM
|
#22
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA/ Bloomington, IN, USA
Posts: 2,624
|
Exactly, it shouldn't be difficult at all.
__________________
me-- "Sometimes you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't. Sometimes I feel like the moon is made of cheese"
my Hindibonics-speaking Indian roommate--"Dawgs, do you have any idea how much bacteria that would take?"
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|