04-11-2005, 10:11 PM
|
#31
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brighton, Michigan
Posts: 256
|
you wouldnt be able to find a current gen M3 for that price anyway, they hold there
value. look for a vett you can find a year or 2 old vet for cheep, even a Z06
can be had for under 30k, vetts dont hold any resale value, they are cheep chevy
junk, but there fun
|
|
|
04-11-2005, 10:27 PM
|
#32
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
^^ he might be able to find a slavaged one for for about 30
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
04-11-2005, 10:42 PM
|
#33
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bellevue, Washington
Posts: 3,694
|
__________________
|
|
|
04-11-2005, 10:55 PM
|
#34
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
^^ whichever you can't afford
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
04-11-2005, 11:44 PM
|
#35
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 5,106
|
All I havet to say about the M3 deal is, if they couldnt handle the stress, they would break easy at the Nurburgring. I mean, they Got an M5 there and a new m3 and they dont even break in the engine... I dont hear them breaking down ever.
__________________
Guess who's Back!
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 12:35 AM
|
#36
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
RC there is not a god damn thing wrong with the M3 and you know it. The engine can handle the abuse it's given because it was built for it. id love to see this proof that you destroyed one with "light" abuse as you so put it.
|
The "light" was fascetious ... but I did destroy an 1999 M3. And has been pointed out before, you can abuse anything to the point of destruction.
All you have to do is keep the car at the upper 5% of the rpm band for a half hour or so. Besides, getting any performance car to overheat and puke it's guts in a Houston summer is not that hard..
I will try go dig out and the paper work of the claim - it was a test drive and the dealer tried to charge me for damage - but my insurance simply parmed the claim off on their insurance..
|
Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
I am sure you just love to believe the BMW's engine's are complete shit simply because they have a better power/liter rating than your plastic tobaggan 
|
At least the power/liter rating keeps the M3 only car lengths behind me - instead of bus lengths...
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 12:39 AM
|
#37
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
|
|
Originally Posted by RC45
|
Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
RC there is not a god damn thing wrong with the M3 and you know it. The engine can handle the abuse it's given because it was built for it. id love to see this proof that you destroyed one with "light" abuse as you so put it.
|
The "light" was fascetious ... but I did destroy an 1999 M3. And has been pointed out before, you can abuse anything to the point of destruction.
All you have to do is keep the car at the upper 5% of the rpm band for a half hour or so. Besides, getting any performance car to overheat and puke it's guts in a Houston summer is not that hard..
I will try go dig out and the paper work of the claim - it was a test drive and the dealer tried to charge me for damage - but my insurance simply parmed the claim off on their insurance..
|
Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
I am sure you just love to believe the BMW's engine's are complete shit simply because they have a better power/liter rating than your plastic tobaggan 
|
At least the power/liter rating keeps the M3 only car lengths behind me - instead of bus lengths... 
|
AH HA!! so it wasn't an E46 M3. It was an E36 With the S52!  The E46 M3 didn't show up until '02
__________________
my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
|
|
|
04-12-2005, 02:28 AM
|
#38
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
|
Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
AH HA!! so it wasn't an E46 M3. It was an E36 With the S52!  The E46 M3 didn't show up until '02 
|
Doesn't matter - it was a late model M3, about 18 months old at the time... and it died..
|
|
|
04-13-2005, 03:57 AM
|
#39
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 155
|
thanks for all of your input guys, im def. going to consider all your opinions and I'll let ya'll know what my decision is.
__________________
Ferrari freak! especially the F50.
Old cars: 97' Lexus ES300, 99' Lexus RX300, 05' Audi A4 2.0T Quattro
Current: 08' BMW 335i coupe sports pkg./19" sport rims
|
|
|
04-13-2005, 04:11 AM
|
#40
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 427
|
(Assuming that you're talking about a new car)
If you want fast:
Evo, STi, G35, S2000
If you want luxury:
3-series, A4
If you want reliability:
TSX
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|