PDA

View Full Version : Worst Mercedes-Benz... Ever


evoWalo
05-10-2005, 08:58 AM
It is sooooo ugly...

http://img215.echo.cx/img215/8867/1023181eg.jpg

http://autoweek.com/article.cms?articleId=102318

Ghostbat
05-10-2005, 09:12 AM
I don't think it's that ugly compared to other trucks. It's just that this type of cars aren't very beautiful to start with.

blah
05-10-2005, 10:51 AM
Please tell me they arent going to do this. That looks like a Honda Ridgeline. JUST SAY NO MERCEDES.

sndr
05-10-2005, 11:00 AM
Please tell me they arent going to do this. That looks like a Honda Ridgeline. JUST SAY NO MERCEDES.

Well they build an R-Class and a Vaneo so this isn't so bad

gtx28
05-10-2005, 01:11 PM
Ya typical merc, im not a big fan of the mercedes, the only one i really like is not really a mercedes its more mclaren than mercedes the slr.

Sir_GT
05-10-2005, 04:09 PM
It is sooooo ugly...

http://img215.echo.cx/img215/8867/1023181eg.jpg

http://autoweek.com/article.cms?articleId=102318

A-HAHAHAHA!!! :lol:

Mercedes = FORD!!!

Premium car brand my ass. I don't think I'll ever pay the same money for a Merc as I will for BMW... at least there's still one premium brand that knows the meaning of "class".

crayzayjay
05-10-2005, 07:54 PM
Vile :puke:

SPEEDKILLAR
05-10-2005, 08:16 PM
Well, from an economic point of view, it is a smart move, as long as you have a demanding market for this, it is common sense to deliver and earn some pennies.

ZfrkS62
05-10-2005, 08:40 PM
Well, from an economic point of view, it is a smart move, as long as you have a demanding market for this, it is common sense to deliver and earn some pennies.

The last thing Merc needs is more unreliable crap hitting the road. Pennies are not going to save MB. nothing short of a miracle will.

In all honesty, MB needs to kill off half their line, and up the reliabilty of the rest. Maybe if they bring back some of their reliability and class, they just MIGHT be able to make a comeback.

They have a loooonnnggg way to go though.

pharzo
05-10-2005, 08:54 PM
It does look quite ugly if you just look at it fleetingly, but then it kind of...just makes sense. I guess it's a just another luxury SUV-type thing. They'll probably make it, as they have proven they don't care much for their luxury car image anymore, with things such as s-class diesels, the a-class, the c-class, vaneo, viano, and their various microbuses and trucks. If they do make it'll probably be a success, and be bought by people like Brad Pitt, and some 'bling' obsessed weirdo's who'll put '24's' on it. Personally, I hate it, but in the long run, probably a wise choice for Mercedes

ZfrkS62
05-10-2005, 09:16 PM
They've already tripped. ETI is any time now :lol:

sentra_dude
05-10-2005, 09:30 PM
:roll:

one word,
Hideous!

zr2man99
05-10-2005, 11:21 PM
Its not ugly, its just wierd seeing the three pointed star on a pickup. But you people think every SUV/truck thing is ugly.

sads
05-11-2005, 01:30 AM
Boy I wonder why their building a pickup, its just the larggest untapped car segment in the U.S. But this looks suapeciously like the ssangyong musso RX290S
http://www.stevejarvinmotors.com.au/MussoSpecial.pdf

Chaos in 1983!
05-11-2005, 02:41 AM
Oh no , is this actually real? I hope it's not. Is this a variation of the new M or G Class??? if it is a variaton of the G class then all Mercedes should just be re-badged to a Ford or some other shit.

saadie
05-11-2005, 04:15 AM
Its not ugly, its just wierd seeing the three pointed star on a pickup. But you people think every SUV/truck thing is ugly.
exactly ..... they should make a sub division fer suv's and pickups ans all ... with a iff logo 8) :lol:

Sir_GT
05-11-2005, 09:01 AM
Its not ugly, its just wierd seeing the three pointed star on a pickup. But you people think every SUV/truck thing is ugly.

Not at all. I'm a fan of Pickups and SUVs... I just don't think it suits Mercedes.

brembo: Nice try mate, but there's nothing classy about sharing platforms with VW. :)

I mean, why pay 20-odd grand for a tarted up Golf? Because it has a four-wheel drive system that's inferior to what the Japanese offer? No thanks.


I would ALWAYS rather buy a purpose-built car... such as a BMW. ;)

evoWalo
05-11-2005, 09:14 AM
Just wait til BMW gets their own pick up. ;)

crayzayjay
05-11-2005, 09:29 AM
Never! :bad-words:

saadie
05-11-2005, 09:45 AM
lmfao .. pathetic ...
the green one rocks :mrgreen:

evoWalo
05-11-2005, 10:53 AM
My eyes! My eyes! They're bleeding!

ZfrkS62
05-11-2005, 12:39 PM
Blasphemy. Pure Blasphemy :| :bad-words: Dani, as punishment for posting those, i here-by order you to drive a riced out civic for a month :P :wink:

Sir_GT
05-11-2005, 04:01 PM
Lol. Nice try you guys.

To be honest, I would LOVE to see a BMW pickup. At least if the "|||M" boys get hold of it, the F150 Lighting will finally have some real competition. :)

Sir_GT
05-11-2005, 04:05 PM
Just wait til BMW gets their own pick up. ;)

Like Mitsubishi and Mercedes? :lol:

ZfrkS62
05-11-2005, 05:33 PM
Blasphemy. Pure Blasphemy :| :bad-words: Dani, as punishment for posting those, i here-by order you to drive a riced out civic for a month :P :wink:

Nooooooooo!!! Please... a riced out Civic nooo!!! :puke: :lol:

well..given your postings in the babes section...i think we could let you go with a wing and fart pipe. Nothing to rediculous, but still shameful. And i'll knock you down to two weeks :wink:

ZfrkS62
05-11-2005, 10:26 PM
Brembo, what kind of backing does Audi provide their cars in terms of warranty and maintenence?

4yr/50K upgradeble warranty with 3yr/36K upgradeble maint?

Audi does have class, I admit. I think it's the whole "owned by Volkswagen" thing that demotes Audi a bit for me. that and thier incessant reliance on turbos :?

Sir_GT
05-12-2005, 05:57 AM
brembo: Nice try mate, but there's nothing classy about sharing platforms with VW. :)

I mean, why pay 20-odd grand for a tarted up Golf? Because it has a four-wheel drive system that's inferior to what the Japanese offer? No thanks.


I would ALWAYS rather buy a purpose-built car... such as a BMW. ;)

I would rather have a Golf than a 3 series BMW from the new line up, but then again Im not a poser either, I`ll leave that to you fashion boy......

Where'd the posing business come from? :|

Ah well. Enjoy the Golf then.

Gnome
05-12-2005, 09:09 AM
Its not ugly, its just wierd seeing the three pointed star on a pickup. But you people think every SUV/truck thing is ugly.
Yes, I think most SUVs are ugly, and trucks with four doors are a lot worse. This looks better than that Ssangyong, but there are better looking cars in that class. The cabin is too long compared to the total length of the car.

BACR
05-12-2005, 01:07 PM
I think its UGLY! :shock:

coloradosilver
05-12-2005, 02:42 PM
Looks to be the exact same car as the M class SUV with a bed attached. Not much originality there. Mercedes is just trying to get their share of the market for thisntype of vehicle, although it seems like they're selling out to me.

crayzayjay
05-12-2005, 08:11 PM
Audi are trying to seperate them self some from VW now, before they sold VW and Audi in the same dealers they will not do this anymore as far as I have heard.....
Maybe so, but when the new Passat looks so much like an Audi, you have to wonder what was the point...

If someone showed this pic to me a few months ago i would have said it was an Audi

http://a332.g.akamai.net/f/332/936/12h/www.edmunds.com/media/news/regularnews/122204/2005.volkswagen.passat.500.jpg

ZfrkS62
05-12-2005, 08:21 PM
Brembo, what kind of backing does Audi provide their cars in terms of warranty and maintenence?

4yr/50K upgradeble warranty with 3yr/36K upgradeble maint?

Audi does have class, I admit. I think it's the whole "owned by Volkswagen" thing that demotes Audi a bit for me. that and thier incessant reliance on turbos :?

Audi got a 3yr/100k a 12 years warranty on rust as the main thing I guess....

I know what you mean with the VW thingy, but VW`s are good cars for what you pay and their money make the other cars under the umbrella better so I dont care.....

Audi are trying to seperate them self some from VW now, before they sold VW and Audi in the same dealers they will not do this anymore as far as I have heard.....You dont like their use of turbos this is one of the reasons I like them, but it seems like you will like them more now as they are moving away from turbos and are making more N/A engines....

The 1 year rust warranty actually scares me :lol: I can only think of one thing that would cause reason for a company to offer such a warranty, and that is that theres a bad problem with this.

Is the 3/100 all inclusive or limited?

sorry for all the questions, as i said i don't know much about how audi backs their cars.

I think competition will tighten up alot once Audi goes N/A. Turbos just mean more maintenence work needs to be done.
Audi's aren't all that bad, I did almost go through their training program :wink:

ZfrkS62
05-12-2005, 09:04 PM
lol, oops, i read it wrong :lol: somehow i read it as 12 months :lol:

well the reason i would rather discuss Audi is because they are BMW's only remaining competitor in the sport/luxury class since Mecedes has effectivley sealed their own coffin, so i would like to focus a bit more on where Audi falls "topgeartom" :wink:

I don't think Audi should entirely distance themselves from turbos, as you said, some models should remain forced just for tradition.

I think it's alot more impressive to get 400HP NA though than it is to get 600 by force feeding an engine :wink:

ZfrkS62
05-12-2005, 10:06 PM
You as a guy with the technikal know how, would know that building a well functioning FI engine are not easy and its far more than slapping a turbo on an engine and boom power appears....Its just as advanced as a N/A engine, butin addition it have to make the turbo and all the things that comes along with that to work in addition to being a well advanced engine.....


notice i didn't say that i didn't find it impressive. I just said i dont' find it AS impressive :wink:

With FI you need to have a lower compression ratio and also need to make damn sure your fuel mapping doesn't lean out at any point. With ignition mapping being key as well, you would really need to make sure that the spark advance is correct, otherwise if one cylinder begins to "ping" it can spell massive problems for the engine as the force of the combustion could easily crack a ring or shoot the cylider temps up high enough to melt a hole in the piston.

Now with NA these days comperssion ratios are almost back up to the point where they were in the 60's, which drives up combustion temps; Leaner mixtures, which also up temps and more powerful ignition systems. (guess what that does :wink: )
should pinging occur, chances are there is something wrong in the whole of the system which is going to cause temps to rise across the board and possibly ping multiple cylinders. Now running fuel and ignition maps is jsut as important here as it is in FI engines for the reason that it is easier for the engine to run out of air given the fact that it must pull its own air in.

Everyone has their own opinion on which is better and more impressive, and being an Audi driver i would expect your answer to be FI, just as i do an AMG fan :wink:

NA engines are getting just as light as FI engines. Although if you were to compare the weight of a FI V8 and a NA V8, i can only guess as to which is going to be lighter :wink:

ZfrkS62
05-12-2005, 10:25 PM
true turbos are the best bang for your buck :twisted: but the sound of a high compression, NA with 4-2-1 tuned headers with a 3 inch X-pipe into a set of glasspacks... :drool: that gets my heart racing everytime :D

ZfrkS62
05-12-2005, 10:50 PM
don't deny it brembo, you know it's true :wink: If i wanted an immediate 35 horse all i gotta do is dump 500 bucks on a used T4 and a header. There is no way to push that out of raising compression (1,000+ for a decent domed piston set)

well..i take it back..turbos are the second best bang for the buck...Nitrous is 1st...but it brings up a whole another can of worms of problems..a pandora's box if you will

neilo63
05-13-2005, 06:37 AM
It needs a lit oily rang sticking out of the petrol tank. Mercedes stop hoare-ing up the auto industry.

ZfrkS62
05-14-2005, 05:13 PM
^^ 4 years ago i'd have been asking the same question. But after spending a year and a half working at an import shop....i've just learned that if it seems retarded, someone will do it :?

But yes i know what needs to be done to install a turbo. It isn't exactly a bolt on part :wink: I don't really know the sizes, so i just threw T4 out there since its a size i commonly hear :bah:

ZfrkS62
05-14-2005, 09:00 PM
well, if they are stupid enough to use one forum post as their basis for turbocharging their Civic, then i say they deserve the damage they do to their car when they forget to run the vacuum line to the wastegate from the intake :lol:

After all, there is a section for mods and such, and i know adam24k posted a whole fat ass article on turbo basics and tuning :wink:

What i was refering to is just the ease of getting the parts 2nd hand, so i can see where the confusion would come from.

crayzayjay
05-14-2005, 09:05 PM
Did you guys ever see the 'flux capacitor' thread? It's on another forum but it worked its way around the internet quite a bit.

Gold :mrgreen:

DeMoN
05-18-2005, 10:08 PM
That really IS ugly... something I saw on that page that I really dont like ...

http://www.autoweek.com/files/specials/wallpaper/firepower/firepower_1024.jpg

c'mon thats a DB9 Ripoff!

numerouno
05-19-2005, 05:20 AM
firepower may be an aston copy, but at least they imitated sth classy and sleek but the benz; ugly doesn't do it justice it's horrendously ugly! :puke:

ae86_16v
05-19-2005, 11:52 PM
Wow. . . nasty. That's my story and I am sticking with it.