After seeing
turbo's review...I am still not the least bit convinced on this car. Yes, it handles...and I was wrong on that, but that doesn't change the ugly looks of this car, or the excessive width, or the boring exhaust note. Yes, the car has impressive performance, but...it lacks so many of the other factors that make a great supercar.
I would take an F40 over this car in a heart beat. 8)
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDCORE
|
Originally Posted by sentra_dude
44L/100km...I'm guessing that's about, 11.6gal/62mi, or 5.3mpg! Got gas!  |
Hey isnt that still better than JC's Ford GT  
Great reviews here of ppl that havent seen it let alone driven it |
Well, according to the article, that is the mpg they got with 'brisk' driving, which probably doesn't equal 'track' driving (which is what JC quoted when he said the GT got 4 mpg). Track driving would have to come somewhere between the max 125L/100km (0.5 mpg) and 44L/100km (5.3 mpg)...so I'm betting it gets worse than the GT.
Threaded Mode
