General Chat General chat about anything that doesn't fit in another section here |
05-16-2004, 04:11 PM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 3,224
|
Hammond getting hypnotised was the funniest thing in the world... you guys have to see it
__________________
|
|
|
05-16-2004, 04:21 PM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 259
|
Wasn't impressed! Last weeks was much better. Hypnotism was fake and annoying.
SLR was impressive if totally flawed! Really don't see the point. Who want's that over an SL55?? Anyone whos into driving would never buy a car with an autobox and brakes that are an on/off switch. They would go for something else. And people who don't mind automatic with fake brakes, would not be able to tell the difference between SLR and SL55. Was fast though, but proper mclaren, porsche gt and enzo would anihilate it!
__________________
"If everything seems under control then you're just not going fast enough"
|
|
|
05-16-2004, 05:06 PM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 108
|
Paul McKenna: 'What's that?' (pointing at the steering wheel)
Richard Hammond: 'That's... um... the big control'.
Totally agree about the SLR, though. And see how cramped JC was inside it, too.
|
|
|
05-16-2004, 05:07 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Santiago, Chile
Posts: 2,558
|
Originally Posted by caneswell
Wasn't impressed! Last weeks was much better. Hypnotism was fake and annoying.
SLR was impressive if totally flawed! Really don't see the point. Who want's that over an SL55?? Anyone whos into driving would never buy a car with an autobox and brakes that are an on/off switch. They would go for something else. And people who don't mind automatic with fake brakes, would not be able to tell the difference between SLR and SL55. Was fast though, but proper mclaren, porsche gt and enzo would anihilate it!
|
I want it over the SL55 , i think its a superb car
__________________
"It changes direction like a fly, grips like a barnacle and goes like a jet fighter on combat power" ( Lambo Gallardo ) .JC.
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 03:09 PM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South East Asia
Posts: 226
|
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 03:12 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
Originally Posted by caneswell
Wasn't impressed! Last weeks was much better. Hypnotism was fake and annoying.
SLR was impressive if totally flawed! Really don't see the point. Who want's that over an SL55?? Anyone whos into driving would never buy a car with an autobox and brakes that are an on/off switch. They would go for something else. And people who don't mind automatic with fake brakes, would not be able to tell the difference between SLR and SL55. Was fast though, but proper mclaren, porsche gt and enzo would anihilate it!
|
And your statement is probably based on some kind of experience :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar
|
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 03:13 PM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
Originally Posted by Joel
Paul McKenna: 'What's that?' (pointing at the steering wheel)
Richard Hammond: 'That's... um... the big control'.
Totally agree about the SLR, though. And see how cramped JC was inside it, too.
|
JC isn't quite the smalest person on earth :roll:
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar
|
|
|
|
05-17-2004, 04:34 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 259
|
Originally Posted by SPEEDKILLAR
Originally Posted by caneswell
Wasn't impressed! Last weeks was much better. Hypnotism was fake and annoying.
SLR was impressive if totally flawed! Really don't see the point. Who want's that over an SL55?? Anyone whos into driving would never buy a car with an autobox and brakes that are an on/off switch. They would go for something else. And people who don't mind automatic with fake brakes, would not be able to tell the difference between SLR and SL55. Was fast though, but proper mclaren, porsche gt and enzo would anihilate it!
|
And your statement is probably based on some kind of experience :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
|
Which statement do i required experience for? I have experience of hypnotism, i have experience of the kind of people that buy cars with autoboxes. No i haven't back to back tested the enzo, porsche and mclaren (unfortunatly!) I'm just going on what road testers/journalists are saying. as 99.999% of the population has to.
__________________
"If everything seems under control then you're just not going fast enough"
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 10:06 AM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 9
|
I heard the stig drove it on that one! I'll find a download soon. :roll: :fadein:
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 11:41 AM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 438
|
i don't think they would beat the SLR by that much at all. I mean the SLR did already crush the pagani zonda. how much more do you think those cars can beat the zonda by?
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 01:39 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 259
|
Originally Posted by godspeed06
i don't think they would beat the SLR by that much at all. I mean the SLR did already crush the pagani zonda. how much more do you think those cars can beat the zonda by?
|
Not sure by how much, probably more than you think. In autocars "worlds fastest car" article, the zonda c12s was beaten by the Noble m12, 911 gt3 and tvr 350c. All by over 2 seconds on a 1:20 lap. Was the top gear tested zonda even the c12s? Was done a while ago, the original zonda 'only' had 500 bhp. The SLR is also 400kg heavier than enzo, carrera gt and zonda. And 600kg heavier than the real mclaren!! (there are cars that weigh much less than 600kgs!!) And all but the zonda have similar if not more power.
__________________
"If everything seems under control then you're just not going fast enough"
|
|
|
05-18-2004, 02:46 PM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 438
|
wow! the zonda looks badass but i guess it can't hold its own anymore. though, it did beat the 911GT3 on the top gear track. the lotus excige even blew the 911GT3 away. i want the new elise so bad. i am definitely getting a used one after college.
|
|
|
05-20-2004, 06:06 PM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 259
|
Told you so, !
Top Gear Circuit:
Dry Best Laptime
Radical SR3 - 1:19.?
Porsche Carrera GT - 1:19.8
Mercedes McLaren SLR - 1:20.9
Westfield XTR - 1:22.6
Lamborghini Murcielago - 1:23.7
Pagani Zonda - 1:23.8
Koenigsegg - 1:23.9
Noble 3.0 - 1:25.0
Lamborghini Gallardo - 1:25.8
__________________
"If everything seems under control then you're just not going fast enough"
|
|
|
05-20-2004, 06:20 PM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
|
If my memory serves me well, the Zonda's time was on a wet track, so we can't count on that. We must also consider these cars on different tracks, with different settings and different atmospheric conditions. They're all very fast! 8)
|
|
|
05-20-2004, 06:32 PM
|
#15
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Out of the factory...
Posts: 526
|
The Zonda was done in a wetlap. The car was sliding around, i'd say the car lost atleast 2 seconds due to the wetlap.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|