Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Hobbies and Leisure Time > Computers, Consoles, Gadgets And Gizmos



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-13-2008, 11:35 AM   #1
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default Lockheed Martin/Northrop Grumman/BAE F-35B is awesome and will kick your ass.

Supposedly classified CG demo video.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 02:51 PM   #2
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

The Harrier on steriods
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 10:53 PM   #3
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

i still don't like the addition of more moving parts.
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 11:06 PM   #4
STiInYourEye
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 128
Default

Vtol ftmfw!
STiInYourEye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2008, 11:07 PM   #5
styla21
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,744
Default

Gosh that's awesome...
__________________
styla21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 03:16 AM   #6
Spiffu
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 252
Default

And here is real thing.


The F-35 wasn't a black project, the stealth aspects of course remain classified like all other U.S. stealth based aircraft but this project is unilateral spanning variants for several allies, Britain and Germany.

This on the other hand.


I pitty anyone that gets in a dog fight with one of these things.
__________________

It's an 06 dammit!

Last edited by Spiffu; 10-14-2008 at 03:23 AM.
Spiffu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 10:58 AM   #7
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

^Epic fail for misspelling maneuverability on the second video.


Originally Posted by Spiffu View Post
The F-35 wasn't a black project, the stealth aspects of course remain classified like all other U.S. stealth based aircraft but this project is unilateral spanning variants for several allies, Britain and Germany.
Yup. The X-35 and the X-32 were both considered, but Boeing's X-32 was just so ugly. And too radical.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 11:06 AM   #8
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

I *think* the real reason the X-32 wasn't chosen was because there was a back-room deal to build the Lockheed variant after they lost the F22 battle. Technically, theirs was superior; but their bid was too much.
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 11:14 AM   #9
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

^Possibly. I've heard that all over when the X-35 was chosen, but I'm glad Lockheed won, though.

The X-32 was really radical though. So much that the demonstrator couldn't even have the radical Pelikan tail, and that they had to submit a second design in the middle of the X-32 production with conventional wings for the actual proposal. And I remember them having to remove the front "chin" of the plane during the VTOL test because of safety precautions. That kind of kinks does make a test plane design seem unreliable.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2008, 11:19 AM   #10
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

The Gov. has to make sure that there is "still" competition in the aerospace industry by dishing out contracts to the generally better bid; with exceptions when the longevity of the other is in question
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump