View Single Post
Old 08-05-2006, 01:48 AM   #66
ZfrkS62
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Just south of Confused
Posts: 7,647
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Originally Posted by ZfrkS62
^^ wasn't that a lack of driver's skills though?
Isn't every car carsh?

If you could have saved it, then there would be not wreck.

The car snap oevrsteered and smashed into a tree and burst into flames.

Then a car got airborne on an undualting italin freeway feeder and hit some mile poosts/pole and exploded into bits.

Then a car got airborne on anundualting smooth US multi lane freeway

and now a car gets airborne while slowing down on an undulating open road...

-- I guess it could be argued that the cars presented the drivers with uncontrollable situaitons and blame the drivers... but what if the cars have a propensity for unpredictable behaviour when presented with unnatural attitudes and angles of attack?
obviously the flatter the underside of a car, the more tendency it has to follow Bernouli's Principle and act like a wing. Look at the two Mercedes wrecks in LeMans (everyone know's the ones i mean. Where the cars suddenly lift off, flip multiple times and land oh so violently) Sure you've got 2 tons of downforce on the car, but if you throw a nice little pocket under the car, guess what. Houston we have a prob.....>crash<....lem.

I guess Ferrari forgot to check for this while driving ruts into Fiorano..or whatever their damn test track is.
__________________

my carbon footprint is bigger than yours
ZfrkS62 is offline   Reply With Quote