View Single Post
Old 05-13-2006, 01:56 AM   #11
FocalSpeed
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by sameerrao
Originally Posted by TT
As expected, Sigma is much crappier.. you pay for what you get :bah:
thanks for proving it once again
Sigma 70-200 f2.8 is very good. I have one and am very happy with it. Are you refering to all Sigma lenses or a specific lens
I was thinking about the same question, I've heard nothing but good about the sigma 70-200 f2.8, the only draw back is the quality of the material used, tahts about it, but optics wyze it is comparable to the Canon L 70-200 f2.8.
__________________
FocalSpeed is offline   Reply With Quote