Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net

Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net (http://www.motorworld.net/forum/index.php)
-   Magazine Scans (http://www.motorworld.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=29)
-   -   evo #86, Bugatti Veyron (http://www.motorworld.net/forum/showthread.php?t=32532)

dingo 12-10-2005 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leo_26782

It is quite surprising that no one noticed something strange on page 87 :lol: :wink:

I still don't notice anything after a second look, what is it?

TT 12-10-2005 10:08 AM

Indeed weird because the same phrase in the text is correct as far as I remember

dingo 12-10-2005 10:09 AM

oh W12......I was looking for something in the picture. :oops:

leo_26782 12-10-2005 10:30 AM

Finally :lol: :lol: :lol:

Congrat TT, I was starting to wonder if I remember it wrong :wink: It's quite funny that it has to be the picture king who realize a text problem :lol:

stradale 12-10-2005 04:20 PM

Thanks a lot for the scans, TT. I was curious about what evo would have to say about the Veyron. Pretty much what I expected, in the end. It's a marvel of engineering indeed and giving it full whack would probably blow my mind, but somehow it's not as appealing as some of the other supercars. Maybe it's the result of Piëch's initial approach. He didn't set out to build the most astonishing supercar ever, but he just had two numbers on his mind (400 and 1000) and subsequently earmarked the empty Bugatti shell to act as the package material.

The styling of both the interior and exterior don't appeal to me either. These colours make it even worse. In the picture on the first page it looks terrible IMHO. The word that actually came to mind immediately, was "gay". :?

martin100 12-10-2005 06:53 PM

OMG this is the test the Veyron truly deserves, so many pages :D Thanks infinitely TT i canīt wait to read it!

sentra_dude 12-10-2005 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TT
Always wondered the same :D mainly because I always thought it would be painfull to click 18 thumbs to get the full pages :bah:

It is painful to click that many thumbs, and breaks up the reading to do that, this way (full size pics) is much better for reading articles, imo. :D

TT 12-10-2005 07:56 PM

LOL, I just experimentes the thumbs technique in the newest scans.. we'll see what to do next

dingo 12-10-2005 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sentra_dude
Quote:

Originally Posted by TT
Always wondered the same :D mainly because I always thought it would be painfull to click 18 thumbs to get the full pages :bah:

It is painful to click that many thumbs, and breaks up the reading to do that, this way (full size pics) is much better for reading articles, imo. :D

it depends on how you read it I suppose. I don't read the article from within my browser, I save all the images into my scans folder and read the m later. :)

leo_26782 12-11-2005 10:12 AM

It depends for sure, I personnaly prefer this way, you just have to scroll down to read the whole article. But well... :bah: Both are as good as the article is :wink:

leo_26782 12-11-2005 03:31 PM

Well usually, it flicks to page 2 quite quickly (like now :wink: )


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.