Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat > Car Gallery



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-12-2003, 05:45 PM   #46
1zippo1
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,668
Default

Good looking car and it drives even better then it looks.
1zippo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2003, 05:51 PM   #47
cho_888
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,562
Default

Have you driven the 2004, or the current model? but yes it does hold the road well.
__________________
Australia. JW Link to Down Under
cho_888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2003, 08:12 PM   #48
f0racer
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle, USA
Posts: 91
Default

I think the new rims on the 2004 S2000 were an option ($2000+) for the "old" S2000.

AblativE wrote:

jap and aus call the racing one type-R, yanks call it type-S don't they.....so what's type-V? type-R sounds the best
Unfortunately, enthusiast living in the U.S don’t really get the Type R versions of Honda cars, and when we do, they’re usually detuned in way of either HP for passing emissions regulations, suspension setting (soften), no shedding of weight and etc. The Acura RSX Type S is a lightly tuned car but by no means the (new Integra) Type R version in Japan. The same story goes for the Civic Si. All we have of the NSX is a coupe and targa version, no Type S or S Zero and definitely no Type R (new or old).

For AblativE and those who want some information on the S2000 type-v check out this link:

http://world.honda.com/news/2000/4000707.html
f0racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2003, 06:45 AM   #49
cho_888
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,562
Default

the Japanese get a lot more options than the rest of the world, no new rims for Aus.
__________________
Australia. JW Link to Down Under
cho_888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2003, 06:56 AM   #50
SDK2003
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solihull - UK
Posts: 502
Default

The changes to the S2000 whilst few are perfect.
__________________


|| Canon 20D x2 | 17-40L | 24-70L | 100 USM Macro | 100-400L IS | 580EX ||
SDK2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2003, 07:21 AM   #51
cho_888
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,562
Default

yes who likes the old shpe better and who preferes the new one.
I like the back of the new one although i like the front of the old one.
__________________
Australia. JW Link to Down Under
cho_888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2003, 08:16 AM   #52
gis
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lancashire,United Kingdom
Posts: 3,846
Default

i like the back of the new one aswell,i also like the new shape exhausts,they look sweet,the front of the old one just looks..............MEAN and i love that
__________________

http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/5803/dansigsp7.jpg
gis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2003, 12:44 PM   #53
SDK2003
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Solihull - UK
Posts: 502
Default

The back of the new one looks much better as does the interior
__________________


|| Canon 20D x2 | 17-40L | 24-70L | 100 USM Macro | 100-400L IS | 580EX ||
SDK2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2003, 05:50 PM   #54
cho_888
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,562
Default

yeah the interior has been improved, the first S2000 dosnt even have a leather center consol, its carpet!
__________________
Australia. JW Link to Down Under
cho_888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump