Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Japanese Cars

Japanese Cars Japanese car discussion



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2008, 03:27 AM   #1
Pokiou
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,451
Default AMUSE HOUSE GTR - ECU cracked..

GT-R tuning update: Amuse breaks 600 hp, tranny woes at MCR






With all the news surrounding the Nissan GT-RV-Spec, the progress on the Godzilla tuning front has been largely overlooked. According to a recent article in Japan's BestCar magazine, the Amuse team has broken the 600 hp mark (at the crank) with a combination of a high-flow exhaust and a tweaked ECU. There were no details on how the GT-R's computer was hacked, but Amuse was able to up the boost to 18 psi, resulting in an increase in output to 602.73 hp and 576.95 lb.-ft. of torque.

However, tuners are beginning to question how the stock gearbox will hold up under the strain of additional output. MCR, which brought out its GT-R for filming of Hot Version 93, has been exacting its own brand of punishment on its tuned GT-R and is worried how long the transmission will last. It's not clear if the tranny woes are due to the clutch plates or something else, but it's been all but confirmed that dual-clutch gearboxes have an issue with additional torque since the friction surface is much smaller than on a stock (read: single plate) clutch. MCR's best guesstimate is that the stock 'box might only be able to hold up to the additional power for 12 months before problems begin arise. Now, we're particularly interested in how Nissan is beefing up the tranny on the V-Spec to handle its rumored 600 hp.

Pokiou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 04:34 AM   #2
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

Thanks for the info. it really seems that the previous GT-R was much easier to tune ...
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 11:42 AM   #3
04RCSTI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 516
Default

I called it, did I not? To all of you that said "no, the engine is already high strung" eat that. 600HP on tuning alone (come on like exhaust gets more than 20HP). I'm sure it can handle more. Next step I see coming is 660-700 @ 20-21.
__________________
Coming soon.
04RCSTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 12:27 PM   #4
rusrocket
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 143
Default

I'm really skeptical of the tuning business for the GT-R. It seems like Nissan went through great effort to make all the drivetrain components work together as efficiently as possible and messing with the ECU disrupts the synchrony they created.
rusrocket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 12:51 PM   #5
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

It will always be tunable to a certain degree or else it will be a slap in the face for Nismo.
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 04:19 PM   #6
fordgt84
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by 04RCSTI View Post
I called it, did I not? To all of you that said "no, the engine is already high strung" eat that. 600HP on tuning alone (come on like exhaust gets more than 20HP). I'm sure it can handle more. Next step I see coming is 660-700 @ 20-21.


no doubt i'm sure the engine could handle abit more muscle, but i'm still worried about the gearbox though...
fordgt84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 04:57 PM   #7
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

Originally Posted by 04RCSTI View Post
I called it, did I not? To all of you that said "no, the engine is already high strung" eat that. 600HP on tuning alone (come on like exhaust gets more than 20HP). I'm sure it can handle more. Next step I see coming is 660-700 @ 20-21.
If you're referring to me, you're equivocating with how the word "tune" was used.

Nissan has pushed the little 3.8 pretty far. I really doubt any big gains will be made with a tune by itself. Let's not forget that there's a slight possibility that it makes that much power already. (My guess as of now is something around 510 . . . with 15% drivetrain loss that would be about 434 to the wheels)
Like I everyone knows, more boost is always an option for more power.

Like I said, not much will come from a tune alone. Some sort of mod combined with a tune is a different story. If an owner wants to be a little braver with boost (or who knows what), I bet they could get much more just like you predicted.
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 05:05 PM   #8
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

600bhp?

*yawn*

Wake me when they get 600 to the wheels.

A 600bhp beached whale, is still a beached whale
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 05:22 PM   #9
pagani
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
Default

Originally Posted by RC45 View Post
600bhp?

*yawn*

Wake me when they get 600 to the wheels.

A 600bhp beached whale, is still a beached whale
Soon
pagani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 05:26 PM   #10
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by pagani View Post
Soon
They can always fit an LS3 in it to make it easier.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 06:59 PM   #11
Pokiou
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,451
Default

Originally Posted by RC45 View Post
600bhp?

*yawn*

Wake me when they get 600 to the wheels.

A 600bhp beached whale, is still a beached whale
LOL.. you banana
Pokiou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 07:46 PM   #12
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by HeilSvenska View Post
They can always fit an LS3 in it to make it easier.
Yeah - and that's way before you need to boost it as well....
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 08:10 PM   #13
04RCSTI
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Miami
Posts: 516
Default

I wasnt talking about you RC, i was talking in general because a few people said that it wasnt going to make much more power since it was high strung already.

You guys cannot be serious about the LS3 thing lol.

As far as the tranny goes, I think it should be able to hold 600 but I'd guess that its near the limit considering its 120hp up from what its usually at. I'd say that the tranny cant hold more than 650 without modifications of some sort...
__________________
Coming soon.
04RCSTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 08:14 PM   #14
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by 04RCSTI View Post
You guys cannot be serious about the LS3 thing lol.
What's wrong with the LS3? GM LS engines are some of the most flexible engines available. LS3 produces 430hp @ 4400rpm in the new Corvettes. You fit that engine with a twin turbo. 600hp? No problem.

The VR38DETT makes 480hp @ 6400rpm. I'm simply saying that it'll be easier and faster to make 600hp with the LS3. Kind of a "duh/dur" kind of statement, but oh well.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 08:15 PM   #15
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

I just thought I'd remind you that the GT-R hater club isn't so unreasonable.

LS3 GT-R . . . . . .
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump