Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > American Cars > American Cars Pictures and Videos



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2007, 04:41 PM   #31
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 04:48 PM   #32
pagani
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
Default

Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
Anyway can you swap the mustang rear end for the rear end of the ford gt?
8)
pagani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 04:48 PM   #33
pagani
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
Default

Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
Anyway can you swap the mustang rear end for the rear end of the ford gt?
8)
pagani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:37 PM   #34
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
8)
That's the oversimplified impression that I don't want peple to get. The Roush isn't that good, especially when compared to Saleens. The Shelby isn't that bad either.
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:37 PM   #35
79TA
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,570
Default

Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
8)
That's the oversimplified impression that I don't want peple to get. The Roush isn't that good, especially when compared to Saleens. The Shelby isn't that bad either.
79TA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:39 PM   #36
pagani
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
Default

Originally Posted by 79TA
Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
8)
That's the oversimplified impression that I don't want peple to get. The Roush isn't that good, especially when compared to Saleens. The Shelby isn't that bad either.
Why is saleen better than roush?
pagani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:39 PM   #37
pagani
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
Default

Originally Posted by 79TA
Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
8)
That's the oversimplified impression that I don't want peple to get. The Roush isn't that good, especially when compared to Saleens. The Shelby isn't that bad either.
Why is saleen better than roush?
pagani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:42 PM   #38
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
8)
That's the oversimplified impression that I don't want peple to get. The Roush isn't that good, especially when compared to Saleens. The Shelby isn't that bad either.
Why is saleen better than roush?
Unfortunatley, the Euro's dont get much in the area of Saleens... and the Roush has only been liked much since last years Clarkson dvd...
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:42 PM   #39
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
8)
That's the oversimplified impression that I don't want peple to get. The Roush isn't that good, especially when compared to Saleens. The Shelby isn't that bad either.
Why is saleen better than roush?
Unfortunatley, the Euro's dont get much in the area of Saleens... and the Roush has only been liked much since last years Clarkson dvd...
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:52 PM   #40
pagani
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity
Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
8)
That's the oversimplified impression that I don't want peple to get. The Roush isn't that good, especially when compared to Saleens. The Shelby isn't that bad either.
Why is saleen better than roush?
Unfortunatley, the Euro's dont get much in the area of Saleens... and the Roush has only been liked much since last years Clarkson dvd...
The english magazine evo
Has had a roush mustang as their project car.
And i remember a dutch car magazine had a feature whit a saleen mustang.
pagani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:52 PM   #41
pagani
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity
Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Originally Posted by pagani
Originally Posted by 79TA
Saleen Mustangs are more sports cars

Shelby GT500's are more muscle cars

Roush's are something in between. I'll be cheap and use the vague term, "performance car"

They all more than qualify for the terms pony car and muscle car regardless though.
I think it's pretty easy
Roush stangs are for corners.
The gt 500 is for straightline fun.
8)
That's the oversimplified impression that I don't want peple to get. The Roush isn't that good, especially when compared to Saleens. The Shelby isn't that bad either.
Why is saleen better than roush?
Unfortunatley, the Euro's dont get much in the area of Saleens... and the Roush has only been liked much since last years Clarkson dvd...
The english magazine evo
Has had a roush mustang as their project car.
And i remember a dutch car magazine had a feature whit a saleen mustang.
pagani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:56 PM   #42
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Saleens... are just cooler. 8)
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 05:56 PM   #43
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Saleens... are just cooler. 8)
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 06:13 PM   #44
T-Bird
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
Default

Saleen is waay more hardcore than Roush and are of a better quality. Atleast Saleen can make a Mustang with more than 500hp and handles like a mother...
T-Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 06:13 PM   #45
T-Bird
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
Default

Saleen is waay more hardcore than Roush and are of a better quality. Atleast Saleen can make a Mustang with more than 500hp and handles like a mother...
T-Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump