12-10-2005, 10:07 AM
|
#16
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
Originally Posted by leo_26782
It is quite surprising that no one noticed something strange on page 87
|
I still don't notice anything after a second look, what is it?
__________________
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 10:08 AM
|
#17
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Indeed weird because the same phrase in the text is correct as far as I remember
__________________
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 10:09 AM
|
#18
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
oh W12......I was looking for something in the picture. ops:
__________________
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 10:30 AM
|
#19
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Genève
Posts: 451
|
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 04:20 PM
|
#20
|
Regular User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,737
|
Thanks a lot for the scans, TT. I was curious about what evo would have to say about the Veyron. Pretty much what I expected, in the end. It's a marvel of engineering indeed and giving it full whack would probably blow my mind, but somehow it's not as appealing as some of the other supercars. Maybe it's the result of Piëch's initial approach. He didn't set out to build the most astonishing supercar ever, but he just had two numbers on his mind (400 and 1000) and subsequently earmarked the empty Bugatti shell to act as the package material.
The styling of both the interior and exterior don't appeal to me either. These colours make it even worse. In the picture on the first page it looks terrible IMHO. The word that actually came to mind immediately, was "gay".
__________________
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 06:53 PM
|
#21
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,545
|
OMG this is the test the Veyron truly deserves, so many pages Thanks infinitely TT i can´t wait to read it!
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 07:50 PM
|
#22
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,610
|
Originally Posted by TT
Always wondered the same mainly because I always thought it would be painfull to click 18 thumbs to get the full pages :bah:
|
It is painful to click that many thumbs, and breaks up the reading to do that, this way (full size pics) is much better for reading articles, imo.
__________________
------------
1992 Toyota Celica GT 5spd, intake.
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 07:56 PM
|
#23
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
LOL, I just experimentes the thumbs technique in the newest scans.. we'll see what to do next
__________________
|
|
|
12-10-2005, 10:01 PM
|
#24
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
Originally Posted by sentra_dude
Originally Posted by TT
Always wondered the same mainly because I always thought it would be painfull to click 18 thumbs to get the full pages :bah:
|
It is painful to click that many thumbs, and breaks up the reading to do that, this way (full size pics) is much better for reading articles, imo.
|
it depends on how you read it I suppose. I don't read the article from within my browser, I save all the images into my scans folder and read the m later.
__________________
|
|
|
12-11-2005, 10:12 AM
|
#25
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Genève
Posts: 451
|
It depends for sure, I personnaly prefer this way, you just have to scroll down to read the whole article. But well... :bah: Both are as good as the article is
|
|
|
12-11-2005, 03:31 PM
|
#26
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Genève
Posts: 451
|
Well usually, it flicks to page 2 quite quickly (like now )
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|