Ferrari Everything related to the Prancing Horse goes in here! |
02-11-2005, 07:05 PM
|
#16
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France
Posts: 204
|
After quick verification, I'm sure an F40 does 0-100Km/h in about 4.5 seconds and believe me it's not that slow ... for you knowledge an F50 run it in 3.9s
|
|
|
02-11-2005, 07:09 PM
|
#17
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,236
|
Originally Posted by 360modena
Sorry guys but after quick verification, I can say an F40 does 0-100Km/h in about 4.5 seconds and believe me it's not that slow
And for you knowledge an F50 run it in 3.9s.
|
Where did you get that info (just curious)?
Like have been said before, Ferrari claims 3.9 for the F40 and 3.7 for the F50.
And I've seen those numbers confirmed by some magazines.
But then again, I've also seen some 4.x numbers.
__________________
|
|
|
02-11-2005, 07:33 PM
|
#18
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France
Posts: 204
|
Originally Posted by |Nuno|
Originally Posted by 360modena
Sorry guys but after quick verification, I can say an F40 does 0-100Km/h in about 4.5 seconds and believe me it's not that slow
And for you knowledge an F50 run it in 3.9s.
|
Where did you get that info (just curious)?
Like have been said before, Ferrari claims 3.9 for the F40 and 3.7 for the F50.
And I've seen those numbers confirmed by some magazines.
But then again, I've also seen some 4.x numbers.
|
4X times! I'm surprised about it. I've seen these times in every mags and Ferrari books I red, but I confirmed with the first one I found , it's called "Models Ferrari".
F40
F50
Wait a minute I will verify on Ferrari web site...
|
|
|
02-11-2005, 07:47 PM
|
#19
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France
Posts: 204
|
Well after more investigation on the web I didn't found any informations that can confirm my data but have a look to that F40 http://www.mcarsweb.com/ferrari/f40.htm ...much more faster that an enzo
|
|
|
02-11-2005, 07:52 PM
|
#20
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,236
|
Yeah, I see... Like I said before the F40 0-100 times varies a lot.
1st: The Lightweight package: a factory option that brings the weight even further down. Around 50Kg, if I'm not mistaken...
2sd: Tyres. Since we're talking about a old car, newer tyres will make a big diference.
And then the usual factors that influence every car's time.
As for the F50, a 3.9 is only 0.2s off, so it seems reasonable.
EDIT: Haha, 3.5...
__________________
|
|
|
02-11-2005, 09:50 PM
|
#21
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 1,026
|
Jeremy Clarkson(Top Gear)...when he tested the F40, McLaren F-1, Enzo Pagani Zonda, Carrera GT, XJ 220 (Enzo's episode) said ..
"F40 0-60 mph in 3.2s, and nothing you've seen tonight can match that" did anyone see that?
I think the 3.2 seconds, actually is the F40 LM..
by the way...
quicker than the McLaren F-1?!?!
__________________
550 Maranello
Powered by DSC-H9
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:40 AM
|
#22
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,236
|
Originally Posted by raphaelws
Jeremy Clarkson(Top Gear)...when he tested the F40, McLaren F-1, Enzo Pagani Zonda, Carrera GT, XJ 220 (Enzo's episode) said ..
"F40 0-60 mph in 3.2s, and nothing you've seen tonight can match that" did anyone see that?
I think the 3.2 seconds, actually is the F40 LM..
by the way...
quicker than the McLaren F-1?!?!
|
Yeah, but Clarckson was wrong. He messed up the numbers.
I'll see if I can find the LM time tough.
__________________
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:50 AM
|
#23
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
|
Originally Posted by |Nuno|
Originally Posted by raphaelws
Jeremy Clarkson(Top Gear)...when he tested the F40, McLaren F-1, Enzo Pagani Zonda, Carrera GT, XJ 220 (Enzo's episode) said ..
"F40 0-60 mph in 3.2s, and nothing you've seen tonight can match that" did anyone see that?
I think the 3.2 seconds, actually is the F40 LM..
by the way...
quicker than the McLaren F-1?!?!
|
Yeah, but Clarckson was wrong. He messed up the numbers.
I'll see if I can find the LM time tough.
|
Clarkson is always wrong(almost )...And it doesn't surprise me since he's a guy who calls the Enzo the F60.
__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:59 AM
|
#24
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,236
|
^^ True, true...
__________________
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 11:12 AM
|
#25
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 1,026
|
Clarkson is always wrong(almost )...And it doesn't surprise me since he's a guy who calls the Enzo the F60.
|
ehehe yeah
__________________
550 Maranello
Powered by DSC-H9
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 11:21 AM
|
#26
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,236
|
And yeah, the LM does 0-100kmh in 3.2s and 0-60mph in 3.1s.
__________________
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 01:00 PM
|
#27
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Posts: 1,026
|
And yeah, the LM does 0-100kmh in 3.2s and 0-60mph in 3.1s
|
hum.. that interesting!
__________________
550 Maranello
Powered by DSC-H9
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 03:20 PM
|
#28
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
|
Originally Posted by mv
Originally Posted by |Nuno|
Originally Posted by raphaelws
Jeremy Clarkson(Top Gear)...when he tested the F40, McLaren F-1, Enzo Pagani Zonda, Carrera GT, XJ 220 (Enzo's episode) said ..
"F40 0-60 mph in 3.2s, and nothing you've seen tonight can match that" did anyone see that?
I think the 3.2 seconds, actually is the F40 LM..
by the way...
quicker than the McLaren F-1?!?!
|
Yeah, but Clarckson was wrong. He messed up the numbers.
I'll see if I can find the LM time tough.
|
Clarkson is always wrong(almost )...And it doesn't surprise me since he's a guy who calls the Enzo the F60.
|
Forgive him.... He's three times older than you
__________________
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|