03-29-2005, 11:33 AM
|
#16
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Czech republic
Posts: 563
|
A truly fabulous car. Aston-Martin has quite a weird marketing though - first they made a DB9 which was actually better than their flagship and now the interior of the base model is lifted from the DB9. It saves money on a one hand but one the other hand if I were a DB9 owner I wouldn't be delighted at all.
__________________
It's not about how fast you go, it's about how you go fast. - Enzo Ferrari
|
|
|
|
03-29-2005, 12:05 PM
|
#17
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 852
|
thanks for the great scan and the new AM looks incredible, where do I make my deposit?
|
|
|
|
|
03-29-2005, 12:46 PM
|
#18
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK, Slovenia, Poland
Posts: 1,124
|
Congrats on the new scanner! Wonderful scans, even better car! 
I'll take this over a 911 ANY day 
__________________
Perfection comes in the form of any Ferrari
|
|
|
|
|
03-29-2005, 03:57 PM
|
#19
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 438
|
i love both this aston and the DB9 both very beautiful, sophisticated looking cars. but does anyone else agree with me that yellow just does not work for the car? i love the silver and green and black on this car, but yellow just doesnt do it for me, i think it ruins it in a way.
|
|
|
|
|
03-29-2005, 07:48 PM
|
#20
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: België
Posts: 3,213
|
Thanks for the article, quite a nice read.
It promises to be a hell of a machine 
__________________
Bob Woodward - State of denial
Tariq Ali - Clash of Fundamentalisms
Blaire is a figleaf
Cars are my hobby, driving them is my passion.
|
Originally Posted by Dan\/6
damn speedkillar, if you didnt have a title already it would now say 'robofucker' or similar  |
|
|
|
|
|
03-31-2005, 10:48 AM
|
#21
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
|
Originally Posted by topgeartom
right, i thought it would be OK if they werent too wide, i mean i dont think anyone still runs 800x600 screen resolution anymore do they?
Plus TT posts up the images directly, and i only did it this way because it was a mag scan, and when the only thing you wanna see is the picture (the article) you cant be arsed clicking loads of little thumbnails.
|
Its not the size which is the problem, its more to do with the excess usage of imageshacks bandwidth everytime someone loads this page
http://www.jabbasworld.net/portal.php?article=7 --> there is a note about it on the mainpage
As someone else mentioned TT hosts his pics on JW which is something you could do also I guess
I hope I don't sound like too much of an ass  .....just trying to explain it
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-31-2005, 11:59 AM
|
#22
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: W.Yorks England
Posts: 1,266
|
not a hint of an ass anywhere - i understand what you mean now, sorry. Ive posted up my latest lot of scans as thumbnails, and will do so in the future, thanks for letting me know!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
03-31-2005, 07:02 PM
|
#23
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
|
no problem mate
__________________
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
