FERRARI vs FORD : THE REMATCH

[jorge]

Thanks for the article!

[sikx5]

Thanks jabba for the article, but i only skimmed through it, damon hill is in it, what a tool, i hate that shithead.

[Jabba]

Originally Posted by tigerx and i posted this before jabba ,

I did have a good look to make sure it hadn't been posted already...I couldn't see it in this section...where did you post it before then ?

[mindgam3]

No ones compared them directly on track, and seeing as though theres only 0.4 of a second difference between them on the TG track i would think they're on track performance is fairly similar. Yes its got alot more torque but that doesen't really matter as much on a race track and theres numorous accounts in magazines of the CS being an excellent road car.

In favour of the GT it has exclusivity and an engine built in britain But the CS has one of the greatest if not the greatest sounding engines and probably a marginally better chassis, theres no doubt i'd take the CS And as people have said, the 360 is a 5-6 year old car and we're comparing it to a brand spanking new Ford GT, lets see how the F430 compares when it comes out.

[Xploded]

Thanks for the scans, I will give it a read over abit latter on .... but thanks for the work in advanced cant wait to get some time to read this one he he

[TransAm]

I'd still take the Ferrari regardless of DT's opinion.

[BADMIHAI]

If only the CS came with a six speed open gate shifter, I'd take it over the Ford any day. But even with the paddle shifters I'd probably still take the Ferrari. *runs to test drive both cars and see which one he will buy*