Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Hobbies and Leisure Time > Books, Comics And Magazines > Magazine Scans



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2004, 03:28 AM   #1
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default Sportbilen: BMW M3 CSL Schnitzer vs Porsche 911 GT3 RS

I found it on rs6.com, only 3 pages scanned out of 33 pages.
http://www.rs6.com/forum/showthread....7&pagenumber=1

This is whats writen in the end of 3 pic.

#When the laps was over and the test computer checked of its content, its showed that the imposibel had happend. The King(GT3 RS) is beaten on its on turf. And its not done by any small marginal, its done by 11 seconds. 14 sec better than a standard CSL erlier did#

(sport auto time stockGT3 RS 7. 47/ stock CSL 7.50)

"Mattias Ekblom time GT3 RS 7.40 stock but Pirelli P Zero Corsa.

"Mattias Ekblom time OCL Brorssons CSL 7.36. Note stock engine, uppgraded breakes, chassi and 36kg of the car. Michelin Sport Cup R tires.
Nurnburgring:
M3 CSL : 7.36 min
GT3 RS : 7.40 min



__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 03:38 AM   #2
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

I can't believe the CSL time of 7:36, that's close to the CGT time
But maybe with track tyres and upgraded brakes ...
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 04:00 AM   #3
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default

Originally Posted by yg60m
I can't believe the CSL time of 7:36, that's close to the CGT time
But maybe with track tyres and upgraded brakes ...
There is also a CSL "loaded" with supercharger and 480hp doing 7.30 min

But I must say, 7.36 min with only 360hp, impressive !!!
__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 06:34 AM   #4
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Well... the M3 CSL have a 50/50 weight distribution, is light, and is fast... so that time is not that surprising... but as you see in the pic... in this case it has a rollcage so I assume it also have some more tricks to make it even faster.
well GT3 RS also got a cage and R-tires and shouldnt be compared with regular GT3.
I also think GT3 RS has lower weight than CSL, GT# RS also got better acceleratation.

But what surprised me more, is that you can buy a CSL or a GT3 RS for half the price compare to CGT. If you only want a trackcar I go with a CSL or a GT3. But if I hade the money for a CGT it would be my choice anyway
__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 08:09 AM   #5
cooperluke
Regular User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leiria, Portugal
Posts: 1,443
Default

I like the CSL a lot, but that time is to fast ...
__________________
CB

cooperluke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 08:28 AM   #6
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default

Originally Posted by cooperluke
I like the CSL a lot, but that time is to fast ...
fast but true, there is no reason to lie about it.
Put R-tires and do some modifications on CGT and it will be even faster.
__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 07:43 PM   #7
jamberl
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 418
Default

Originally Posted by Just_me
Originally Posted by cooperluke
I like the CSL a lot, but that time is to fast ...
fast but true, there is no reason to lie about it.
Put R-tires and do some modifications on CGT and it will be even faster.

Yeah, alot of it is to do with tires. The porsche racing cars for the 24 hour races do 7:01 laps of the 'ring' :shock: Shows what racing tyres and suspension tuning can do.
Thats why a stock CSL is faster than a stock GT3, despite being heavier: the stock CSL basically has cut slicks, the stock GT3 has road tires.
__________________
jamberl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 08:51 PM   #8
chest3r
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Portugal
Posts: 2,166
Default

It's really impressive how this CSL beat the GT3 RS time :shock: :shock: And the stock CSL also did a time near the GT3. Like Jeremy would say: What a car ......

I already loved the CSL but I'm loving it more and more each time I see it in action
__________________
chest3r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2004, 09:38 PM   #9
styla21
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,744
Default

So does this prove that LOADED guys claim of 7: 30 may infact be possible - seeing it has similar weight and 100hp more?
__________________
styla21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2004, 03:24 AM   #10
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default

[quote="jamberl"]
Originally Posted by Just_me
Originally Posted by cooperluke
I like the CSL a lot, but that time is to fast ...
, the stock GT3 has road tires.
yes GT3 has roadtires but GT3 RS (which is the car in the test) dont have it. It got R-tires too but the R-tires on the CSL is the best R-tires at the moment on the market.
__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2004, 03:24 AM   #11
Just_me
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
Default

[quote="jamberl"]
Originally Posted by Just_me
Originally Posted by cooperluke
I like the CSL a lot, but that time is to fast ...
, the stock GT3 has road tires.
yes GT3 has roadtires but GT3 RS (which is the car in the test) dont have it. It got R-tires too but the R-tires on the CSL is the best R-tires at the moment on the market.
__________________
http://germancarzone.com/
Just_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2004, 10:31 PM   #12
kksh
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 152
Default

So there goes the argument we had before about the CSL doing a 7:30 lap or not in the other section. It's amazing how fast the CSL is. Way to go BMW!!! Ultimate stealth car. My kind of car. I'll take the Bimmer over the Prosche anyday. Great test.
__________________
Go Mclaren Go!!!!

Goddamnit...
An entire generation pumping gas, waiting tables; slaves with white collars.
Advertising has us chasing cars, megapixel cellphones and clothes.
Working jobs we hate so we can buy shit we don't need.
We're the middle children of history, man...
No purpose or place.
We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives.
We've all been raised on television to believe that one day we'd all be millionaires, and movie gods, and rock stars.
But we won't. And we're slowly learning that fact.
And we're very, very pissed off
kksh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2004, 03:12 AM   #13
DMbaseball1604
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 650
Default

Pretty sure if you put the same tires on the GT3 RS..it would be a completely different story....
DMbaseball1604 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2004, 10:50 AM   #14
schnell318
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 787
Default

I´m really impressed, I mean the RS is not your average car...and I think it is a fair test, both with R tires and no forced induction.

GT3 should be compared to CSL, GT3 RS being even more extreme should be compared to a tuned CSL since BMW don´t offer something more radical.

Way to go BMW!!!
schnell318 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2004, 04:03 PM   #15
acs power
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sofia (Bulgaria)
Posts: 565
Default

Does anyone have this article because the links to the pages don't work?
__________________
acs power is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump