Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > General Discussion > What You Saw Today

What You Saw Today Got a camera or camcorder ?? Why not put it to good use and show us what you have captured with it today !!!



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-21-2006, 04:43 PM   #1
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default nthimage - 2007 Ford Shelby GT500

www.nthimage.com --> photoshoots 20 hi-res photos







www.nthimage.com --> photoshoots 20 hi-res photos

and some comments about the car
http://www.motorworld.net/forum/show...=40526&start=0

__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006, 05:08 PM   #2
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Those wheels are a lot the C5 Z06..
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006, 05:18 PM   #3
PiTTbuLL003
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 122
Default

very nice shoot!!
I love the shelby mustang's :shock: and the color
PiTTbuLL003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2006, 11:39 PM   #4
Schwalbe
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,455
Default

Very great pix from the mighty Shelby GT500, thanks NTH for them. :good:

I very love the new Mustang Shelby, but it will be 100% better without any stripes on it. I hope Ford will sell a similar version without stripes. But I have to admit those dark grey stripes are less ugly than white stripes on the red GT500.

The wheels are definitively not suitable on this Mustang, I want to see 19'' or 20'' multi spoke wheels with fat lip on it and rear wheels bigger than the front.

But one thing is sure I will want to test it when my nearest SVT dealer will have it.

Cheers !
Schwalbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 01:57 AM   #5
Garretts_turbo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kalamazoo, Mi
Posts: 727
Default

^^ ford said no to larger wheels cuz of the unsprung weight which to me sounds like they're being cheap haha..

i'm not thrilled with the retro stang, but the numbers suggest its pretty kickass for a sports car with a back seat
__________________
www.kzoorice.com
Garretts_turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 03:17 AM   #6
Schwalbe
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,455
Default

Originally Posted by Garretts_turbo
^^ ford said no to larger wheels cuz of the unsprung weight which to me sounds like they're being cheap haha..
A classic explanation from Ford Motor Co.

Those Ford engineers have already copied the wheels of the Corvette C5 Z06 for the wheels of this Shelby GT500 (like RC45 has underlined very well). They should have push their way to also copied the Z06 dimension like....... 265/40ZR17 (Front) and 295/35ZR18 (Rear).
Schwalbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 06:56 AM   #7
Pehtren
Regular User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: slovenia, in my BMW
Posts: 1,465
Default

Very good pics nth :good: , and i like the last one

Very very friendly owner, i hope i will drive this monster some day

Thanks for the pics 8)
Pehtren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 08:09 AM   #8
MartijnGizmo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Groningen - Netherlands
Posts: 1,324
Default

I really like #2! Got a suction-cup-tripod-thing?
__________________
EOS 5D|EOS 600|15-30|24 1.4 L|135 2 L|2x 580EX|2x CP-E3|ST-E2|2x Pocket Wizzard Plus II|IXUS 850IS|Crumpler|Manfrotto|
MartijnGizmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 08:16 AM   #9
dingo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
Default

Nice work mate, very aggressive looking car!

I also have a suction mount but use it for in-car video, too scared to hang my camera off it on the outside of the car.
__________________
dingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 08:33 AM   #10
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by pehtren
Very very friendly owner, i hope i will drive this monster some day
And a very big owner.. (considering the cars not on sale yets.. I am guessing FoMoCo is still the owner.. )

Originally Posted by dingo
I also have a suction mount but use it for in-car video, too scared to hang my camera off it on the outside of the car.
Thats what safety straps are for
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 08:35 AM   #11
dingo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
Default

Originally Posted by RC45

Thats what safety straps are for
yeah and then it dangles and smashes against your paintwork....
__________________
dingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 09:13 AM   #12
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by dingo
Originally Posted by RC45

Thats what safety straps are for
yeah and then it dangles and smashes against your paintwork....
On a metal car, magnetic pad will take car of that concern... and for the rest ducttape and foam sheet is available if you are that concerned.

Bottom line is the good shots both static and moving, take risk - and if you want to move up to the big leagues risk is what it's all about
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 09:26 AM   #13
dingo
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 6,395
Default

Originally Posted by RC45
Originally Posted by dingo
Originally Posted by RC45

Thats what safety straps are for
yeah and then it dangles and smashes against your paintwork....
On a metal car, magnetic pad will take car of that concern... and for the rest ducttape and foam sheet is available if you are that concerned.

Bottom line is the good shots both static and moving, take risk - and if you want to move up to the big leagues risk is what it's all about
Not sure what risk is involved in taking static shots, I've never experienced any....

I'll tell that to the Ferrari owner I'm meeting on Saturday morning for a photoshoot, and see if he's fine with taking that "risk" for some motion shots.
__________________
dingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 09:44 AM   #14
RC45
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
Default

Originally Posted by dingo
Not sure what risk is involved in taking static shots, I've never experienced any....
Waterfront locations, low tide beach locaitons, live trackside locaitons - hell even a Landy in the wild can have dangers associated

Originally Posted by dingo
I'll tell that to the Ferrari owner I'm meeting on Saturday morning for a photoshoot, and see if he's fine with taking that "risk" for some motion shots.
Why not ask him - I think you may pleasently surprised by the response... although a low speed motion shot with a decent hardware mounted camera has as much chance of causing damage as getting in the car and ripping a seat.. *shrug*
RC45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 09:54 AM   #15
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

as long as it isn't mounted on areas that have differing surface areas, you are fine

i had no "coming loose" issues whatsoever.... be it for in car use, or out-of-car use.

was it a risk?

yes, but that is what insurance is for
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump