05-28-2004, 10:49 AM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nicosia, Cyprus
Posts: 861
|
18th May Autocar:C55 vs M3 article!!
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 10:59 AM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sri Lanka
Posts: 31
|
Thanks for the scans dude, was hoping somebody would post it as I was trying to find a way to purchase the mag.
Hope I am not being rude, but is there some way of getting some higher quality scans to read the contents?
Edit : Thanks dude
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 11:09 AM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nicosia, Cyprus
Posts: 861
|
Originally Posted by rayaz
Thanks for the scans dude, was hoping somebody would post it as I was trying to find a way to purchase the mag.
Hope I am not being rude, but is there some way of getting some higher quality scans to read the contents?
|
I'll see what i can do mate!
|
|
|
05-28-2004, 03:09 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 740
|
Nice article 2 bad I can't read it
|
|
|
05-29-2004, 06:34 AM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
|
Great post. I'm a real fan for the M3, so naturally, this comes as very pleasing news to me
__________________
D.K.D.N
|
|
|
05-30-2004, 12:21 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 408
|
I don't think the quality is that bad. I have read articles that had worse quality. So bad that afterwards my head hurt because of all the sqinting. Thanks for the article. I just appreciate the effort.
|
|
|
05-30-2004, 02:15 PM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Guatemala
Posts: 787
|
Thanks for the scan! I think this shows what a winner the M3 was from the first place, no matter what a monster engine AMG sticks in the c-class, it just doesn´t beat it. C55 seems to be a really good car though.
|
|
|
06-01-2004, 02:02 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
Mercedes is getting closer every day..
|
|
|
06-01-2004, 03:17 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 709
|
kinda confused on the #s for the C55. it says in the article that
i wouldn't want to be a C55 owner taking on a C32 at the lights
|
why is the C55 slower, it supposedly has more hp more torque and less weight. Have they changed the gearing or something. Other than that it was a very good article. Thanks!
|
|
|
06-01-2004, 03:35 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 740
|
Thats strange
The first time I checked this post quality was worce
Many thanks now I can read it
|
|
|
06-01-2004, 05:26 PM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Nicosia, Cyprus
Posts: 861
|
:idea: the c55 was slower than the c32 and m3 because as you can read from the article the road where they test the c55 hasn't the same traction as the one where they test the M3!
|
|
|
06-02-2004, 01:55 AM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 709
|
yea i saw that it was wet but still that comment perplexed me about the stoplight and the C32 being faster.
__________________
What good is Gas Mileage without Horsepower? That's why I bought a Saturn.
|
|
|
|
06-04-2004, 01:05 AM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
|
any chance of a re-post Philio?
__________________
D.K.D.N
|
|
|
06-04-2004, 03:25 PM
|
#14
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,351
|
Shit.... :cry:
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|