Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > General Discussion > Motorsport News And Discussion



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2008, 11:31 AM   #16
Sr Mauro
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 12
Default

Now Honda fans can continue saying how good, fast and reliable are their cars and race cars ...... in 1993.
Sr Mauro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 11:53 AM   #17
pitfield
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mayfair/Brighton
Posts: 1,262
Default

Originally Posted by F250 View Post
I hope more manufacturers pull out of F1. How much can Bernie charge the world to watch Lewis Hamilton play with himself?
No, you're right, let's watch some overweight 50 Y-O hick drive around in circles for 2 hours instead.
__________________
MINI MINI MINI MINI MINI MINI MINI MINI
pitfield is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 05:28 PM   #18
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by pitfield View Post
No, you're right, let's watch some overweight 50 Y-O hick drive around in circles for 2 hours instead.
Try 4. And Nascar's pretty good if you can chew through the red neck image. Just good honest racing.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2008, 11:45 PM   #19
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

I personally find NASCAR and similar such races incredibly mundane, but that's just a different type of racing. F1 is about making the best cars possible using as much money as possible; there is a lot more focus on the cars than the drivers. Cost-cutting may improve racing marginally, but it's not really what F1 was originally about.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2008, 04:09 PM   #20
silentm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Basel, CH
Posts: 1,865
Default

Originally Posted by HeilSvenska View Post
if you can chew through the red neck image.
i really couldn't ... sorry i guess i'm a nazi that way
__________________
"Some say that the outline of his left nipple is exactly the same shape as the Nürburgring, and that if you give him a really important job to do, he'll skive off and play croquet... all we know is, he's called the Stig."

The Top Gear Wikiquote
silentm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 11:03 AM   #21
styla21
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,744
Default

Following Friday’s meeting of its World Motor Sport Council in Monaco, the FIA has confirmed details of the cost-cutting measures agreed with the teams for 2009 and beyond.

Changes for next season - expected to save teams at least 30 percent on their 2008 budgets - include a ban on in-season testing, limiting each driver to eight engines - effectively doubling engine life - and cuts in aerodynamic research.

Cost of engines to independent teams will be halved for 2009 and drivers must use the same engine for three consecutive races, with maximum revs cut from 19,000 to 18,000 rpm.

Following moves to equalise engine performance for next season, Renault have been granted permission to make certain modifications to their V8. All other team's engines will remain unchanged.

From 2010 all teams will be able to obtain engines for less than €5 million per season, either from an existing manufacturer or from an independent supplier, and all teams are likely to use the same transmission. Refuelling and tyre warmers will be banned.

The possibility of an entirely new, more energy-efficient and road-relevant power train, likely to include an enhanced KERS system, will be investigated for 2013.

Details of further changes for 2009 and 2010 are due to be announced shortly.

The full statement from the FIA:
The World Motor Sport Council met in Monaco on 12 December 2008. The following decisions were taken:

FORMULA ONE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP

The following measures to reduce costs in Formula One have been agreed by the World Motor Sport Council. These proposed changes have the unanimous agreement of the Formula One teams, who have played a major role in their development. The FIA is grateful to the Formula One Teams’ Association (FOTA) and its Chairman Luca di Montezemolo for their incisive contribution.

2009

Engine

• Engine life to be doubled. Each driver will use a maximum of eight engines for the season plus four for testing (thus 20 per team).

• Limit of 18,000 rpm.

• No internal re-tuning. Adjustment to trumpets and injectors only.

• The three-race rule voted on 5 November remains in force.

• Cost of engines to independent teams will be approximately 50% of 2008 prices.

• Unanimous agreement was reached on a list of proposed changes to the Renault engine for 2009; all other engines will remain unchanged. Comparative testing will not be necessary.

Testing

• No in-season testing except during race weekend during scheduled practice.

Aerodynamic research

• No wind tunnel exceeding 60% scale and 50 metres/sec to be used after 1 January 2009.

• A formula to balance wind tunnel-based research against CFD research, if agreed between the teams, will be proposed to the FIA.

Factory activity

• Factory closures for six weeks per year, to accord with local laws.

Race weekend

• Manpower to be reduced by means of a number of measures, including sharing information on tyres and fuel to eliminate the need for “spotters”.

Sporting spectacle

• Market research is being conducted to gauge the public reaction to a number of new ideas, including possible changes to qualifying and a proposal for the substitution of medals for points for the drivers. Proposals will be submitted to the FIA when the results of the market research are known.

Note: It is estimated that these changes for 2009 will save the manufacturer teams approximately 30% of their budgets compared to 2008, while the savings for independent teams will be even greater.

2010

Power train

• Engines will be available to the independent teams for less than €5 million per team per season. These will either come from an independent supplier or be supplied by the manufacturer teams backed by guarantees of continuity. If an independent supplier, the deal will be signed no later than 20 December 2008.

• This same engine will continue to be used in 2011 and 2012 (thus no new engine for 2011).

• Subject to confirmation of practicability, the same transmission will be used by all teams.

Chassis

• A list of all elements of the chassis will be prepared and a decision taken in respect of each element as to whether or not it will remain a performance differentiator (competitive element).

• Some elements which remain performance differentiators will be homologated for the season.

• Some elements will remain performance differentiators, but use inexpensive materials.

• Elements which are not performance differentiators will be prescriptive and be obtained or manufactured in the most economical possible way.

Race weekend

• Standardised radio and telemetry systems.

• Ban on tyre warmers.

• Ban on mechanical purging of tyres.

• Ban on refueling.

• Possible reduction in race distance or duration (proposal to follow market research).

Factory activity

• Further restrictions on aerodynamic research.

• Ban on tyre force rigs (other than vertical force rigs).

• Full analysis of factory facilities with a view to proposing further restrictions on facilities.

Longer term

The FIA and FOTA will study the possibility of an entirely new power train for 2013 based on energy efficiency (obtaining more work from less energy consumed). Rules to be framed so as to ensure that research and development of such a power train would make a real contribution to energy-efficient road transport.

An enhanced Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS) system is likely to be a very significant element of an energy-efficient power train in the future. In the short term, KERS is part of the 2009 regulations, but is not compulsory. For 2010 FOTA is considering proposals for a standard KERS system. The FIA awaits proposals.

A number of further amendments were adopted for the 2009 and 2010 Sporting and Technical Regulations. Full details will be available shortly on www.fia.com.
__________________
styla21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2008, 08:57 AM   #22
silentm
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Basel, CH
Posts: 1,865
Default

Ban on refueling in 2010?

what the fuck is that supposed to mean? i want to watch an hour or two of racing not just 20 minutes

man i'm really irritated by some of those "changes"

if they want to homologate so much then we can just watch the VW Polo Cup
__________________
"Some say that the outline of his left nipple is exactly the same shape as the Nürburgring, and that if you give him a really important job to do, he'll skive off and play croquet... all we know is, he's called the Stig."

The Top Gear Wikiquote
silentm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2008, 07:12 PM   #23
styla21
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,744
Default

Originally Posted by silentm View Post
Ban on refueling in 2010?

what the fuck is that supposed to mean? i want to watch an hour or two of racing not just 20 minutes

man i'm really irritated by some of those "changes"

if they want to homologate so much then we can just watch the VW Polo Cup
Bigger fuel tank The racing could remain the same duration.
In order to lug fuel rigs to each race, they are put on a 747 and flown. Along with the team. It should save some $200,000 per race.

I see it as a positive. There will still be pit stops for tyres / mechanicals.
__________________
styla21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2008, 11:07 PM   #24
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

But there is this problem:
Possible reduction in race distance or duration (proposal to follow market research).
They actually believe most people want shorter races. I, for one, do not.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 03:46 AM   #25
styla21
Regular User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,744
Default

Originally Posted by Mattk View Post
But there is this problem:


They actually believe most people want shorter races. I, for one, do not.
Agreed. I don't want shorter races either. From what I understand, FOM is conducting quite broad market research on this topic. Hopefully the masses respond with the same sentiment we share.
__________________
styla21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2008, 07:17 PM   #26
FoxFour
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charleston, S.C. USA
Posts: 985
Default

Smart move on Honda's part. They can claim declining economic factors to bow out, saving face in the Japanese boardroom, instead of what probably has really happened, failure to get the team going no matter how much money they poured into it.
The new rules; start of a good move. This gazillion dollar budgets were started in the early 80's and has finally crippled the series. How many teams today have you seen been banging down the doors to plunk down the tens of millions of pounds to get a spot on the grid?
These engine rules are a lot like what F1 had in the seventies- half the grid back then had Cosworth engines and Hewland or Xtrac gearboxes. The teams can still build new engines but to much more strict standards. Limits on onboard engine tuning and stricter standards on aero research, good move also.
__________________
1996 Mustang Cobra. Vortech Kompressor installed.
Many pilots of the time were the opinion that a fighter pilot in a closed cockpit was an impossible thing, because you should smell the enemy. You could smell them because of the oil they were burning.
Adolf Galland
FoxFour is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump