Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Lamborghini

Lamborghini Everything Lamborghini



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2007, 07:52 PM   #1
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default Lp640 Supertest results

NS:
7:47
Dottinger hohe ~ 293 kph! :shock: peak G @ 1.3 G

HHR:
1:11.8 peak G @ 1.15 G

0-200 kph
11.2
200-0 kph
4.9
(0-200-0)
16.1

Aero
30 kg front
11 kg rear

0-100 kph
3.4

36 meter slalom
134 kph

Handling track
129.2

(koenigsegg CCR 1:33.5, and GT3 1:27.2)
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 08:38 PM   #2
5.7 V10
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Out of the factory...
Posts: 526
Default

For comparison

Nurburgring: 7:47

Porsche Carrera GT: 7:32
Pagani Zonda F: 7:33
Koenigsegg CCR: 7:34

Hockenheim Test: 1:11.8

Porsche Carrera GT: 1:08.6
Koenigsegg CCR: 1:09.8
Pagani Zonda F: 1:10.8

110 Metre Evasive: 153 km/h

Pagani Zonda F: 159 km/h
Porsche Carrera GT: 158 km/h
Koenigsegg CCR: 158 km/h

0-100 km/h: 3.4

Pagani Zonda F: 3.8
Porsche Carrera GT: 3.8
Koenigsegg CCR: 3.9

0-160 km/h: 7.7

Koenigsegg CCR: 6.8
Porsche Carrera GT: 7.1
Pagani Zonda F: 7.7

0-200 km/h: 11.2 seconds

Koenigsegg CCR: 9.6
Porsche Carrera GT: 10.2
Pagani Zonda F: 11.4

200 km/h - 0: 4.9 seconds

Pagani Zonda F: 4.4 seconds
Porsche Carrera GT: 4.8 seconds
Koenigsegg CCR: 4.9 seconds


36 Metre Slalom: 134 km/h

Koenigsegg CCR: 138 km/h
Pagani Zonda F: 137 km/h
Porsche Carrera GT: 135 km/h


18 Metre Slalom: 68.7 km/h

Pagani Zonda F: 72.1 km/h
Porsche Carrera GT: 72.0 km/h
Koenigsegg CCR: 71.8 km/h

Kerbweight: 1805kg

Pagani Zonda F: 1371kg
Koenigsegg CCR: 1418kg
Porsche Carrera GT: 1473kg


80-100 km/h: 4th Gear - 2.2 seconds

Pagani Zonda F: 1.5 seconds
Porsche Carrera GT: 1.9 seconds
Koenigsegg CCR: 2.1 seconds

Another set of in-time, 80-120 km/h: 4th/5th/6th

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640: 4.3/5.3/6.1

Koenigsegg CCR: 4.1/6.0/7.9

Porsche Carrera GT 3.3 / 4.1 / 5.4

Pagani Zonda F: 3.3 / 4.2 / 4.9
__________________

5.7 V10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 09:33 PM   #3
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
Awesome laptime - but the fact that it has been able to lap the Ring without crashing is even more impressive!!
LMAO :Lol:
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 10:53 PM   #4
TopGearNL
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The 51st State
Posts: 10,181
Default

Insane figures, yet so close to one another :shock:

I beginning to believe that the Lp640 is able to drive fast without crashing!
__________________
TopGearNL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 11:16 PM   #5
yg60m
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
Default

I don't remember if its direct competitor, the Ferrari 599 GTB, has been tested ? I remember seing a 10. ... on the 0-200 km/h somewhere
__________________
yg60m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 11:32 PM   #6
bmagni
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Mexico
Posts: 3,544
Default

Originally Posted by yg60m
I don't remember if its direct competitor, the Ferrari 599 GTB, has been tested ? I remember seing a 10. ... on the 0-200 km/h somewhere
tested @ the ring or just for performance figures ?
bmagni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2007, 11:42 PM   #7
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by TopGearNL
Insane figures, yet so close :shock:
so close both a 400 and 500 hp car can go faster in street form dont get me wrong, i like the murci.. still undecided about the 640... maybe will have to do a article about comparing both... well, all four!
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 02:19 AM   #8
Lambofighter
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 105
Default

that ring time is a crap, it can do much much better than that!
Lambofighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 11:19 PM   #9
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by Lambofighter
that ring time is a crap, it can do much much better than that!
uh... you do know that HvS is one of the top drivers on NS, right? a man familiar with the LP640 may be able to get an additional 2-3 seconds... even when comparing vs. Walter Rohl in CGT times, and 997 GT3 times.

so, what are you basing your information on that it can do much better then 7:47 ? you do know the car tips the scales at 1800+ KG's right?
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2007, 11:31 PM   #10
5vz-fe
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,167
Default

^I am that's based on the fact that he has a shinny Lambo badge LOL
__________________
5vz-fe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 12:06 AM   #11
r2r
Regular User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Detroit
Posts: 1,562
Default

^^ LOL

Originally Posted by nthfinity
so close both a 400 and 500 hp car can go faster in street form dont get me wrong, i like the murci.. still undecided about the 640... maybe will have to do a article about comparing both... well, all four!
I think your going to get used to the LP640 styling. As for the performance it's nice to see such a heavy car do at least a decent lap time on the nurburgring,

but I do think Lamborghini needs to put Murci on a BIG diet
r2r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 12:44 PM   #12
Stoopie
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United Provinces of the Kingdom of Great Netherlands
Posts: 2,119
Default

Impressive numbers, for a pretty fat car.. Damn that thing would be fast if it went on a diet!
Stoopie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 02:06 PM   #13
Lambofighter
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 105
Default

Originally Posted by nthfinity
Originally Posted by Lambofighter
that ring time is a crap, it can do much much better than that!
so, what are you basing your information on that it can do much better then 7:47 ? you do know the car tips the scales at 1800+ KG's right?
How about this.

6.2L Murcielago did a 7:43 in 2002 by Autocar magazine. Murcielago LP640 is faster than 6.2 Murcielago. And I also thinks that it faster than CarreraGT on a straight. Yep.
I'm sure Horst von Saurma is a great driver, but It's don't meen that he did all he can do make a faster time on Murcielago LP640.

Please forgive my english...
Lambofighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 02:13 PM   #14
harryo2b
Regular User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 476
Default

Yeah lose a few hundred kilo and I'm sure the numbers would be "supercar" terroritory ...jk.

The Lambo is sure one hell of a car though on the street with the presence that it has of being "low, wide and razor sharp".

What's the base price for the LP640?
__________________

2006 Porsche Boxster S/Atlas Grey Metallic/Black/Black/6 spd
Canon 30D/17-85 IS/70-200 4L IS/580EXII/430EX/B+W Filters
harryo2b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2007, 02:14 PM   #15
TNT
Regular User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: :noitacoL
Posts: 2,670
Default

the times alone look good yet when you compare it to other supercars its not that great.
__________________
TNT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump