Go Back   Sports Car Forum - MotorWorld.net > Automotive Brands Forum > Car Chat



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2009, 01:21 AM   #1
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default 2010 Jaguar XJ doesn't look like the one from the 60's!



There's not much to infer from the overhead shot, but everything points to the fact that this will be possibly the most revolutionary Jaguar.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 02:35 AM   #2
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

I really liked the classic XJ look. All this modern stuff just doesn't quite cut it.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 12:05 AM   #3
10000rpmlover
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the US of A, sometimes also London
Posts: 466
Default

oh god, another boring sedan???
__________________

twin turbo, AWD, AWS, 6spd, drop dead gorgeous, what's not to like? mitsubishi should go back and make these again
10000rpmlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 02:43 PM   #4
enzoferrari
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 1,069
Default

I like the XF,this one looks good so far.
__________________
Check out my photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/am1988/:-)
enzoferrari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2009, 07:46 AM   #5
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

It looks good, but the old stuff is better. I have a similar view about most modern things. I recently got a cheap-ass student version of Microsoft Office 2007 purely so I could view docx documents. That is the only good thing about it. Office 2003 is so much better. Just like Windows XP is better than Vista. Or how Windows 98 is better than XP. Hell, I really liked MS-DOS.

The point is, some things just aren't meant to change. You dick around with something great, chances are, you'll fuck up. This looks pretty good, but it's not an XJ. It's something else. It's nothing special. It's just another luxury car. You'd only buy it because your existing XJ doesn't work properly anymore.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 09:42 AM   #6
10000rpmlover
Regular User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: the US of A, sometimes also London
Posts: 466
Default

Originally Posted by Mattk View Post
because your existing XJ doesn't work properly anymore.

true, you must have had a jaguar before in your time, it is always the gripe I hear from Jag owners, that they can't seem to keep the older much sexier jags running
__________________

twin turbo, AWD, AWS, 6spd, drop dead gorgeous, what's not to like? mitsubishi should go back and make these again
10000rpmlover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 10:20 AM   #7
nthfinity
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
Default

Originally Posted by 10000rpmlover View Post
true, you must have had a jaguar before in your time, it is always the gripe I hear from Jag owners, that they can't seem to keep the older much sexier jags running
Not without your jar full of Lucas Smoke
__________________
www.nthimage.com
Car photography website
nthfinity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 06:30 PM   #8
pagani
Regular User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
Default

The xf looks great
I think that the older jag's look a bit dated now.
And i think that the xf will good in 20/30 years from now.




Last edited by pagani; 04-25-2009 at 06:38 PM.
pagani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 08:15 PM   #9
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

^My only gripe with the XF's design is the featureless flank. And the XK just barely gets on by with the hard line on the side.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 10:06 PM   #10
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

I think that the older jag's look a bit dated now.
That's not the point. You don't buy a Jaguar for cutting-edge design.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 10:42 PM   #11
HeilSvenska
Regular User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: The OC™
Posts: 4,881
Default

Originally Posted by Mattk View Post
That's not the point. You don't buy a Jaguar for cutting-edge design.
That kind of thinking's exactly why Jaguar's always in trouble.
__________________
HeilSvenska is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 11:11 PM   #12
Mattk
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 6,610
Default

Well, the XF has been highly rated. I think with that more modern design, Jaguar can complement it with the classic lines of the XJ.
__________________
One stumble does not constitute total failure;
One victory does not constitute total success.
Mattk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump