| The Cool Wall Our version of the cool wall.. you decide what's cool and what's not - view the results HERE |
|
View Poll Results: Cadillac CTS
|
|
subzero
|
   
|
3 |
3.37% |
|
cool
|
  
|
40 |
44.94% |
|
uncool
|
  
|
32 |
35.96% |
|
seriously uncool
|
  
|
14 |
15.73% |
12-02-2005, 04:39 PM
|
#1
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 314
|
Cadillac CTS
Cadillac CTS
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 04:46 PM
|
#2
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
|
If it was a V it would be cool. On its own its just another executive vehicle.
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 05:45 PM
|
#3
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,565
|
Uncool. Garish looks, still not on par with cars like the 3-series. Cadillacs reputation does the rest.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 05:53 PM
|
#4
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
i think they're cool.. wouldn't buy one.. but cool..
__________________
Things worth having don't come easy..
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 06:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lugano, Switzerland
Posts: 23,178
|
Well, though choice.. I was tempted to give it a cool because it is different, it will make for a good change compared to the tons of German saloons we see around, like gray, I went for uncool in the end because it isn't the V
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 09:58 PM
|
#6
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
AL TT Gray :arrow: the picture is of a CTS-V but i think the poll is for a standard V6 Uncool
|
|
|
|
|
12-02-2005, 11:15 PM
|
#7
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,914
|
The CTS-V is a cool car, the normal CTS feels kinda cheap with a few low quality plastic components lying here and there. So I voted uncool.
But if the depreciation of the CTS makes it a sub-$10k car after 4 years, I wouldn't mind getting one 
|
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005, 12:05 AM
|
#8
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancaster,CA,US
Posts: 389
|
find me a cts for under $10,000, its not that bad
__________________
In a Porsche 911, you're going to have a very good time actually driving the thing, but everyone is going to hate you. They're going to give you dirty looks as you drive by, call you names at the lights, vandalise your paintwork in the night and never, ever let you out of a side turning. That's a given.
In the Vantage, everyone's going to want your babies.
-J.C.
|
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005, 12:40 AM
|
#9
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,337
|
Its cool.
|
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005, 01:20 AM
|
#10
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baltimore, Md
Posts: 2,221
|
I think Al needs to clarify if we are voting for the V or not. and if not it should be changed to the V.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005, 04:07 AM
|
#11
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,914
|
|
Originally Posted by noliebro
find me a cts for under $10,000, its not that bad
|
I was half joking about that but it's not entirely impossible *if* CTS gets the same depreciation as the old Catera it replaced
According to http://www.canadiandriver.com/articl...7-00catera.htm a 4 years old Catera would cost C$18k when the msrp was C$45k. The msrp for the CTS is C$39k and with all the rebates and "employee discounts" GM has these days, you never know how cheap the CTS can get few years down the road.
I drive a GM car myself, I don't even want to know how much it's worth now. It sure depreciates alot faster than its 0-60 time  ops:
|
Originally Posted by gigdy
I think Al needs to clarify if we are voting for the V or not. and if not it should be changed to the V.
|
Since many of us have voted, that should be a new entry
|
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005, 04:51 PM
|
#12
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portugal
Posts: 1,236
|
|
Originally Posted by TT
Well, though choice.. I was tempted to give it a cool because it is different, it will make for a good change compared to the tons of German saloons we see around, like gray, I went for uncool in the end because it isn't the V
|
Same here...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005, 05:02 PM
|
#13
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The Basque Country
Posts: 1,459
|
I voted it as a cool....because its beautiful, its quite nimble, the sporty version is approached quite a lot to the M5, E55, RS6 performances, and its cheap....if it wasnt enough, im not very picky with the cars built quality as long as they reach a certain level.....
|
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005, 05:06 PM
|
#14
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hellaware USA
Posts: 3,865
|
|
*if* CTS gets the same depreciation as the old Catera it
|
The difference is people actually want to drive the CTS..
What were the sales numbers on the Catera? Oh thats right, I don't think Ive even seen one on the road lol.
__________________
Common Sense- so rare it's a super power.
|
|
|
|
|
12-03-2005, 09:07 PM
|
#15
|
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,914
|
|
Originally Posted by graywolf624
|
*if* CTS gets the same depreciation as the old Catera it
|
The difference is people actually want to drive the CTS..
What were the sales numbers on the Catera? Oh thats right, I don't think Ive even seen one on the road lol. |
I've seen ONE ever in my life! I was like... wtf is that car  Sadly, I've seen more Alfa Romeo's or Caterham 7's than Catera :roll:
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
