10-19-2005, 04:53 AM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: EU
Posts: 949
|
The new Audi S8
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 05:05 AM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,085
|
Simply Awesome
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 05:24 AM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
Interesting ! Thanks mate But it has the same power as the W12 and less torque. I suppose it will be sportier but they could maybe have done something with the W12 ... I am sure it isn't much more heavy than this V10.
__________________
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 05:29 AM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
450bhp just isn't that impressing anymore in such a big car. Yes yes i know we are spoiled with cars with monster engines but still..
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 05:31 AM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
450bhp just isn't that impressing anymore in such a big car. Yes yes i know we are spoiled with cars with monster engines but still..
|
Maybe an RS8 ...
__________________
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 06:01 AM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,085
|
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
450bhp just isn't that impressing anymore in such a big car. Yes yes i know we are spoiled with cars with monster engines but still..
|
Have you even driven something with this power to weight ratio?
It's gotta be intense - the reality is - ppl love to talk numbers but most ppl can barely get the most of a car with 100 hp
That being said it's probably too much car for you :roll:
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 06:22 AM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,497
|
Originally Posted by blinkmeat
Originally Posted by Ghostbat
450bhp just isn't that impressing anymore in such a big car. Yes yes i know we are spoiled with cars with monster engines but still..
|
Have you even driven something with this power to weight ratio?
It's gotta be intense - the reality is - ppl love to talk numbers but most ppl can barely get the most of a car with 100 hp
That being said it's probably too much car for you :roll:
|
Yes I have. If you had bothered reading both sentences I wrote you would understand that I'm not saying that it's a weak car. When the last S8 hit the market it was top dog. This new S8 just isn't.
BTW I don't understand why you even start attacking me and my driving skills. That's just uncalled for. Feel free to comment my opinions but if I'm a good or bad driver has nothing to do with this.
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 06:28 AM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Zutphen, The Netherlands
Posts: 654
|
A wolf in sheep's clothing
a cutaway pic of the magnificent V10
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
BTW, I guess they're using the V10 over the W12 because it's lighter... and although it has less torque... the sound... and, even more important, the publicity, is better using the V10
|
And don't forget the W-concept needs lots of cooling, the larger radiator(s) add also a lot of extra weight.
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 09:13 AM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 1,835
|
I was hoping for chrome mirrors..... it just looks better :cry:
Edit: I now see that the mirrors are chrome... fantastic!!
It's the most beautiful autobahn cruiser ever
Originally Posted by yg60m
Maybe an RS8 ...
|
Maybe W12 TT?
__________________
"Driving the R8 is like smearing honey into Keira Knightly!" - Jeremy Clarkson
"In principle, this car is too fast for my thoughts!" (Walter Röhrl about the 600+hp Audi S1 Sport)
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 09:46 AM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: not where i want to be.. but life's a bitch i guess..
Posts: 3,262
|
got to hand it to Audi.. their latest cars are simply stunning 8)
__________________
Things worth having don't come easy..
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 09:55 AM
|
#11
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,446
|
Originally Posted by redbaron
A wolf in sheep's clothing
a cutaway pic of the magnificent V10
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
BTW, I guess they're using the V10 over the W12 because it's lighter... and although it has less torque... the sound... and, even more important, the publicity, is better using the V10
|
And don't forget the W-concept needs lots of cooling, the larger radiator(s) add also a lot of extra weight.
|
But the W has a more compact design though right?
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 10:08 AM
|
#12
|
Regular User
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,545
|
Another Audi i´d like to have Very good looking machine! Audis design gets better and better.
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 10:12 AM
|
#13
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Zutphen, The Netherlands
Posts: 654
|
Originally Posted by ae86_16v
Originally Posted by redbaron
A wolf in sheep's clothing
a cutaway pic of the magnificent V10
Originally Posted by dani_d_mas
BTW, I guess they're using the V10 over the W12 because it's lighter... and although it has less torque... the sound... and, even more important, the publicity, is better using the V10
|
And don't forget the W-concept needs lots of cooling, the larger radiator(s) add also a lot of extra weight.
|
But the W has a more compact design though right?
|
Yes, the W12 is shorter but wider that the V10. The overall packaging of the W12 however adds a lot of weight to the front of the car. As sad a larger (and heavier) radiator is needed, this means extra weight in front of the front axle, which is bad for the handling.
One of the main advantages of the V10 is of course the sportier character of the engine compared to the W12. So the W12 is for the powerful more luxurious cars.
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 11:43 AM
|
#14
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,455
|
|
|
|
10-19-2005, 11:57 AM
|
#15
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Montréal
Posts: 2,455
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|