11-11-2011, 07:33 AM
|
#1
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
|
First customer lexus lfa on dyno bonestock
Lexus LFA #3 (first one to goto customer) on a Dyno Dynamics at Forged Performance.
Results 451rwhp which translate to about 18% drivetrain lost. = 532.18 or so.
|
|
|
11-11-2011, 12:15 PM
|
#2
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Detroit
Posts: 9,929
|
Originally Posted by pagani
|
That is an awful lot of driveline loss for a car with so many light weight components; from the flywheel, to the driveshaft, to the brakes, lighter wheels etc. etc.
We just dyno'd a Camaro with a tighter final ratio; and it was 12.7% Driveline loss. Of course, there are a lot of variables that change from a controlled engine dyno room, to a Mustang Dyno... from temperatures, to humidity, and flow properties.
|
|
|
11-11-2011, 03:28 PM
|
#3
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
451rwhp?
LOL -its barely more powerful than a stock C6 Z06
Doesn't a stock Audi V10 R8 kick the LFA's backside?
|
|
|
11-11-2011, 06:31 PM
|
#4
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
|
Originally Posted by RC45
451rwhp?
LOL -its barely more powerful than a stock C6 Z06
Doesn't a stock Audi V10 R8 kick the LFA's backside?
|
They state it's alower reading dyno
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 09:15 AM
|
#5
|
Regular User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: France
Posts: 5,373
|
Nice sound !
__________________
|
|
|
12-07-2011, 10:25 PM
|
#6
|
Regular User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 3,627
|
Originally Posted by nthfinity
That is an awful lot of driveline loss for a car with so many light weight components; from the flywheel, to the driveshaft, to the brakes, lighter wheels etc. etc.
We just dyno'd a Camaro with a tighter final ratio; and it was 12.7% Driveline loss. Of course, there are a lot of variables that change from a controlled engine dyno room, to a Mustang Dyno... from temperatures, to humidity, and flow properties.
|
most shops can't afford that kind of equipment... places like lingenfelter and AMS can but it took them time to get there
|
|
|
12-08-2011, 01:42 AM
|
#7
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Originally Posted by pagani
They state it's alower reading dyno
|
Yep - C6Z06 on a Mustang dyno is abotu 450rwhp
|
|
|
12-08-2011, 05:50 PM
|
#8
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
|
Originally Posted by RC45
Yep - C6Z06 on a Mustang dyno is abotu 450rwhp
|
So it could have a higher power figure on a diffrent type of dyno
But who's give a shit about dyno numbers
|
|
|
12-08-2011, 06:01 PM
|
#9
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 15,413
|
Originally Posted by pagani
So it could have a higher power figure on a diffrent type of dyno
But who's give a shit about dyno numbers
|
Then why the obsession by the LFA guy to post his numbers? LOL
Bet he has buyers remorse when Toyota voids his warranty for using Launch Control.
|
|
|
12-08-2011, 06:42 PM
|
#10
|
Regular User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pagani Productions HQ
Posts: 6,237
|
Originally Posted by RC45
Then why the obsession by the LFA guy to post his numbers? LOL
Bet he has buyers remorse when Toyota voids his warranty for using Launch Control.
|
I guess some people like numbers the best thing of the video is the sound the lfa makes
And i don't if the lfa has been properly run and how many miles it has done
It could be a very fresh barely run in engine.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|